We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Comparison of Biological Screening and Diagnostic Indicators to Detect In Utero Opiate and Cocaine Exposure Among Mother-Infant Dyads.
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 2017 December
BACKGROUND: Opioid and cocaine antenatal substance use can result in significant obstetric and pediatric health implications. Accurate detection of in utero-exposed neonates can improve patient care and health outcomes. Therefore, the effectiveness of mother-infant biological and diagnostic indicators collected at labor and delivery to provide accurate detection of in utero opiate and cocaine exposure was assessed.
METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review included 335 mother-infant dyads exposed to antenatal substances who were delivered between January 2009 and March 2014. Mother-infant dyads were a subset of a larger retrospective cohort of 560 substance-using mothers, who had a valid meconium drug screen (MDS) and anesthesia before delivery. Alternative biological and diagnostic indicators of maternal urine drug screens (UDS), maternal substance use International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and neonatal exposure diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes were compared against MDS. Data were analyzed using classification accuracy measures.
RESULTS: Compared with MDS, maternal UDS had the highest sensitivity [0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.65] and specificity (0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) to detect intrauterine opiate exposure. Maternal substance use diagnosis had the highest sensitivity (0.39, 95% CI, 0.16-0.61) and maternal UDS had the highest specificity (1.00, 95% CI, 0.99-1.00) to detect intrauterine cocaine exposure. Cocaine exposure had significantly higher accuracy scores across detection methods compared with opiate exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternative indicators collected at delivery were ineffective at identifying in utero substance exposure, especially neonatal-exposed ICD-9-CM codes. Low sensitivity scores indicate that many exposed neonates could be misdiagnosed or left untreated. Accurate antenatal exposure identification at delivery is an important form of tertiary assessment that warrants the development of improved screening methodology and standardization of hospital biological drug testing.
METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review included 335 mother-infant dyads exposed to antenatal substances who were delivered between January 2009 and March 2014. Mother-infant dyads were a subset of a larger retrospective cohort of 560 substance-using mothers, who had a valid meconium drug screen (MDS) and anesthesia before delivery. Alternative biological and diagnostic indicators of maternal urine drug screens (UDS), maternal substance use International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes, and neonatal exposure diagnostic ICD-9-CM codes were compared against MDS. Data were analyzed using classification accuracy measures.
RESULTS: Compared with MDS, maternal UDS had the highest sensitivity [0.52, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.39-0.65] and specificity (0.88, 95% CI, 0.79-0.97) to detect intrauterine opiate exposure. Maternal substance use diagnosis had the highest sensitivity (0.39, 95% CI, 0.16-0.61) and maternal UDS had the highest specificity (1.00, 95% CI, 0.99-1.00) to detect intrauterine cocaine exposure. Cocaine exposure had significantly higher accuracy scores across detection methods compared with opiate exposure.
CONCLUSIONS: Alternative indicators collected at delivery were ineffective at identifying in utero substance exposure, especially neonatal-exposed ICD-9-CM codes. Low sensitivity scores indicate that many exposed neonates could be misdiagnosed or left untreated. Accurate antenatal exposure identification at delivery is an important form of tertiary assessment that warrants the development of improved screening methodology and standardization of hospital biological drug testing.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app