Journal Article
Review
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Aortic Valve Replacement: Are We Spoiled for Choice?

Management of aortic valve disease and, in particular, aortic valve stenosis has evolved through the course of time from medical management and balloon valvuloplasty to the presumed gold-standard surgical intervention. However, with the advent of surgical innovation, intra- and postoperative patients monitoring, understanding of hemodynamic dysfunction, and choices of prosthesis, conventional surgical aortic valve replacements are currently being challenged in particular in moderate- and high-risk patients. Although the long-term results and survival are not robustly available, the durability of the new prosthesis, repair, and the freedom from reoperation remain debatable. In this review, we aim to highlight the surgical innovation attained, choices of aortic valve prosthesis, and also dwell on the current evidence, practice, and trend steered to managing patients with aortic valve stenosis.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app