We have located links that may give you full text access.
Needle Tip Visibility in 3D Ultrasound Images.
Cardiovascular and Interventional Radiology 2018 January
AIM: Needle visibility is crucial for effective and safe ultrasound-guided interventional procedures. Several studies have investigated needle visibility in 2D ultrasound imaging, but less information is available for 3D ultrasound imaging, a modality that has great potential for image guidance interventions. We performed a prospective study, to quantitatively compare the echogenicity of various commercially available needles in 3D ultrasound images used in clinical practice under freehand needle introduction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A set of seven needles, containing biopsy needles, a TIPS needle, an ablation needle and a puncture needle, were included in the study. A liver-mimicking phantom and cow liver were punctured by each needle. 3D sweeps and real-time 3D data were acquired at three different angles (20°, 55° and 90°). Needle visibility was quantified by calculating contrast-to-noise ratio.
RESULTS: In the liver-mimicking phantom, all needles showed better visibility than in the cow liver. At large angles, contrast-to-noise ratio and needle visibility were almost similar in both cases, but at lower angles differences in visibility were observed with different types of needles.
CONCLUSION: The contrast-to-noise ratio increased with the increase in angle of insonation. The difference in visibility of different needles is more pronounced at 20° angle. The echogenic properties of inhomogeneous cow liver tissues make the needles visibility worse as compared to a homogenous phantom. The needle visibility becomes worse in 3D real-time data as compared to 3D ultrasound sweeps.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A set of seven needles, containing biopsy needles, a TIPS needle, an ablation needle and a puncture needle, were included in the study. A liver-mimicking phantom and cow liver were punctured by each needle. 3D sweeps and real-time 3D data were acquired at three different angles (20°, 55° and 90°). Needle visibility was quantified by calculating contrast-to-noise ratio.
RESULTS: In the liver-mimicking phantom, all needles showed better visibility than in the cow liver. At large angles, contrast-to-noise ratio and needle visibility were almost similar in both cases, but at lower angles differences in visibility were observed with different types of needles.
CONCLUSION: The contrast-to-noise ratio increased with the increase in angle of insonation. The difference in visibility of different needles is more pronounced at 20° angle. The echogenic properties of inhomogeneous cow liver tissues make the needles visibility worse as compared to a homogenous phantom. The needle visibility becomes worse in 3D real-time data as compared to 3D ultrasound sweeps.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app