Clinical efficacy of levonorgestrel and norethisterone for the treatment of chronic abnormal uterine bleeding.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical efficacy of levonorgestrel intrauterine system with oral norethisterone for the treatment of idiopathic chronic abnormal uterine bleeding.

METHODS: This cross-sectional study was conducted at Bahawal Victoria Hospital, Jubilee Female Hospital, Civil Hospital and private clinics of consultant gynaecologists in Bahawalpur, Pakistan, from March to August 2014, and comprised patients presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding. The patients were equally and randomly divided into two groups, i.e. intrauterine levonorgestrel administered (group A) and norethisterone administered (group B). Mean age, duration of the disease and parity were determined using a predesigned questionnaire. The primary outcomes of the treatments, i.e. reduction in menstrual blood loss assessed by the pictorial blood assessment chart score, were recorded before the initiation of therapy, at 3 months and at 6months of the study. SPSS 16 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS: There were 76 subjects; 38(50%) in each group. In group A, the mean age and mean duration of the disease was 34.16±6.327 years and 6.18±2.415 years compared to 34.21±3.595 years and 6.21±2.418 years in group B. The reduction in menstrual blood loss did not differ significantly between the groups after 3 months (p= 0.321). However, levonorgestrel intrauterine system was found more effective in reducing menstrual blood loss in 36(94.73%) patients, compared to norethisterone-treated patients 28(73.68%) after 6 months of the treatment (p=0.041). The response of both the treatments was found independent of patient's age, parity and chronicity of the disease.

CONCLUSIONS: The levonorgestrel intrauterine system was better than norethisterone with marked clinical benefit of profound reduction in menstrual blood loss.