We have located links that may give you full text access.
The international normalized ratio (INR): What reagent, what instrument? The assessment of the agreement between INR values according to different reagent/instrument combinations.
Journal of Clinical Pharmacy and Therapeutics 2018 Februrary
WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The international normalized ratio (INR) is widely used to monitor patients on vitamin K antagonists. This study aimed to assess the agreement of INR values obtained with different thromboplastin/instrument combinations.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: International normalized ratio was determined on plasmas from 330 patients undergoing antivitamin K treatment (with acenocoumarol), using two calibration methods and four reagent/instrument combinations: Both Neoplastine CI and Neoplastine CI Plus on STA-R instrument from Diagnostica STAGO, Asnières, France; and both Thromborel S and Innovin on SYSMEX 2100i instrument from Siemens Health Care Diagnostics, Marbung, Germany. The agreement analysis was done using the Bland-Altman plot and the Cohen Kappa coefficient.
RESULTS: The mean of the differences between the INR values and the limits of agreement were -0.07 [-0.51 to 0.38] for the Neoplastine CI plus and Neoplastine CI reagents, -0.08 [-1.18 to 1.03] for the Thromborel S and Innovin reagents when the INR was calculated, -0.1 [-1.15 to 0.95] for the Thromborel S and Innovin reagents when the INR was directly calibrated and -0.1 [-0.7 to 0.5] for the Neoplastine CI plus and Thromborel S. Cohen's kappa coefficients were 0.94, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively.
NEW FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: The agreement between the four reagent/instrument combinations was high enough to classify patients as inefficaciously or efficaciously anticoagulated. The data interpretation should always be related to the clinical purpose.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: International normalized ratio was determined on plasmas from 330 patients undergoing antivitamin K treatment (with acenocoumarol), using two calibration methods and four reagent/instrument combinations: Both Neoplastine CI and Neoplastine CI Plus on STA-R instrument from Diagnostica STAGO, Asnières, France; and both Thromborel S and Innovin on SYSMEX 2100i instrument from Siemens Health Care Diagnostics, Marbung, Germany. The agreement analysis was done using the Bland-Altman plot and the Cohen Kappa coefficient.
RESULTS: The mean of the differences between the INR values and the limits of agreement were -0.07 [-0.51 to 0.38] for the Neoplastine CI plus and Neoplastine CI reagents, -0.08 [-1.18 to 1.03] for the Thromborel S and Innovin reagents when the INR was calculated, -0.1 [-1.15 to 0.95] for the Thromborel S and Innovin reagents when the INR was directly calibrated and -0.1 [-0.7 to 0.5] for the Neoplastine CI plus and Thromborel S. Cohen's kappa coefficients were 0.94, 0.76, 0.85 and 0.82, respectively.
NEW FINDINGS AND CONCLUSION: The agreement between the four reagent/instrument combinations was high enough to classify patients as inefficaciously or efficaciously anticoagulated. The data interpretation should always be related to the clinical purpose.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app