Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prognostic Value of Tumor-to-Blood Standardized Uptake Ratio in Patients with Resectable Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

OBJECTIVES: Previously published studies showed that the standard tumor-to-blood standardized uptake value (SUV) ratio (SUR) was a more accurate prognostic method than tumor maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax ). This study evaluated and compared prognostic value of positron emission tomography (PET) parameters and normalized value of PET parameters by blood pool SUV in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who received curative surgery.

METHODS: Seventy-seven patients who underwent curative resection for NSCLC between January 2010 to December 2013 were enrolled in this study. 18 Fluorine-fluorodeoxyglucose (18 F-FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) was performed before surgery. The mean standardized uptake value (SUVmean ), SUVmax , metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) of each lesion was measured, on the workstation. SURmean , SURmax , and TLGSUR were calculated by dividing each of them by descending aorta SUVmean . Cox proportional hazards regression was used to analyze the effect of age, sex, pathological parameters, and PET parameters on recurrence and death.

RESULTS: In Cox regression analysis, N stage predicted for both recurrence ( p  < 0.0001) and death ( p  < 0.0001). SURmax predicted recurrence ( p  = 0.0014), not death. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of SURmax was 0.759 with cutoff value 4.004. However, SUVmax , SUVmean , MTV, TLG, SURmean , and TLGSUR predicted neither recurrence nor death.

CONCLUSIONS: Among PET parameters, SURmax was the independent predictor of recurrence in NSCLC patients who received curative surgery. N stage was the independent prognostic factor for both recurrence and death. Both parameters could be used to stratify the risk of NSCLC patients.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app