Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Ethics and the decision of cardiopulmonary resuscitation].

Revue Médicale Suisse 2017 September 7
Following the guidelines of the Swiss Academy of Medical Science, most Swiss hospitals have implemented advanced directives that define what should be undertaken in case of cardiorespiratory arrest for every patient. This remains difficult to apply for physicians and difficult to understand for patients. From a medical perspective, some confusion occurs around medical directives. Difficulties include subjective misinterpretation of patient's quality of life, as well as decision making bias. In addition, patients overestimate the cardiopulmonary reanimation success rate, modify their choices with time and health status, and might lack their individual ability of discernment. Patient's autonomy must always be encouraged as long as it stays within the limits of medical indications.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app