We have located links that may give you full text access.
Radiographer screening for incidental pulmonary emboli on routine contrast-enhanced computerised tomography scans at a cancer centre.
Clinical Radiology 2018 Februrary
AIM: To introduce and assess effectiveness of a radiographer-led screening programme for the detection of unsuspected pulmonary emboli on routine contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), and to evaluate radiographer response to this extended role.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A training programme was devised for all radiographic staff working in CT. The screening service was introduced and monthly quality assurance performed with cumulative analysis of the first 2 years. Clinical effectiveness before and after screening was evaluated by comparing the time interval between the scan and the start of a clinical consultation for anticoagulant prescription. A satisfaction survey was sent to all participating staff.
RESULTS: Thirty-two radiographers completed the training. During the training period, the radiographer detection rate of incidental pulmonary emboli was 89%. Main, lobar, segmental, and subsegmental emboli were detected. The overall detection rate after full introduction of the programme was 92% for the first 2 years. The time interval between the scan and clinical consultation for anticoagulant prescription dropped from a mean of 1.5 days to a mean of 26 minutes and ensured that treatment was commenced at the same patient attendance. Eighty-four percent of staff completed the satisfaction survey and all were satisfied with the extended role.
CONCLUSION: Radiographer screening for incidental pulmonary emboli was effective and accurate. It resulted in immediate communication with the responsible physician and commencement of anticoagulation therapy at the same hospital attendance, creating a "one-stop" service. Radiographer satisfaction with the extended role was high.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A training programme was devised for all radiographic staff working in CT. The screening service was introduced and monthly quality assurance performed with cumulative analysis of the first 2 years. Clinical effectiveness before and after screening was evaluated by comparing the time interval between the scan and the start of a clinical consultation for anticoagulant prescription. A satisfaction survey was sent to all participating staff.
RESULTS: Thirty-two radiographers completed the training. During the training period, the radiographer detection rate of incidental pulmonary emboli was 89%. Main, lobar, segmental, and subsegmental emboli were detected. The overall detection rate after full introduction of the programme was 92% for the first 2 years. The time interval between the scan and clinical consultation for anticoagulant prescription dropped from a mean of 1.5 days to a mean of 26 minutes and ensured that treatment was commenced at the same patient attendance. Eighty-four percent of staff completed the satisfaction survey and all were satisfied with the extended role.
CONCLUSION: Radiographer screening for incidental pulmonary emboli was effective and accurate. It resulted in immediate communication with the responsible physician and commencement of anticoagulation therapy at the same hospital attendance, creating a "one-stop" service. Radiographer satisfaction with the extended role was high.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app