We have located links that may give you full text access.
A graduated food addiction classifications approach significantly differentiates depression, anxiety and stress among people with type 2 diabetes.
Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice 2017 October
AIMS: To examine differences in depression, anxiety, and stress across people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (t2d) classified according to a four level processed food addiction (PFA) severity indicator dichotomy.
METHODS: Four hundred and eight participants with a t2d diagnoses completed an online survey including the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) and the DASS-21. Based on YFAS symptom counts participants were classified as either: non-PFA; mild-PFA; moderate-PFA; or severe-PFA.
RESULTS: Multivariate, λ=0.422, F(9,978.51)=46.286, p<0.001, np 2 =0.250, and univariate analyses of variance demonstrated that depression F(3,408)=159.891, p<0.001, np 2 =0.543, anxiety F(3,408)=127.419, p<0.001, np 2 =0.486, and stress scores F(3,408)=129.714, p<0.001, np 2 =0.491, significantly and meaningfully increased from one PFA classification level to the next. Furthermore, the proportion of participants with more severe classifications of depression χ2 (12)=297.820, p<0.001, anxiety χ2 (12)=271.805, p<0.001, and stress χ2 (12)=240.875, p<0.001, were significantly higher in the more severe PFA groupings.
CONCLUSION: For people with t2d, PFA is an important and meaningful associate of depression, anxiety, and stress, and that the adopted four level PFA severity indicator dichotomy is valid and useful.
METHODS: Four hundred and eight participants with a t2d diagnoses completed an online survey including the Yale Food Addiction Scale (YFAS) and the DASS-21. Based on YFAS symptom counts participants were classified as either: non-PFA; mild-PFA; moderate-PFA; or severe-PFA.
RESULTS: Multivariate, λ=0.422, F(9,978.51)=46.286, p<0.001, np 2 =0.250, and univariate analyses of variance demonstrated that depression F(3,408)=159.891, p<0.001, np 2 =0.543, anxiety F(3,408)=127.419, p<0.001, np 2 =0.486, and stress scores F(3,408)=129.714, p<0.001, np 2 =0.491, significantly and meaningfully increased from one PFA classification level to the next. Furthermore, the proportion of participants with more severe classifications of depression χ2 (12)=297.820, p<0.001, anxiety χ2 (12)=271.805, p<0.001, and stress χ2 (12)=240.875, p<0.001, were significantly higher in the more severe PFA groupings.
CONCLUSION: For people with t2d, PFA is an important and meaningful associate of depression, anxiety, and stress, and that the adopted four level PFA severity indicator dichotomy is valid and useful.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app