We have located links that may give you full text access.
Triply Bonded Gallium≡Phosphorus Molecules: Theoretical Designs and Characterization.
Journal of Physical Chemistry. A 2017 September 8
The effect of substitution on the potential energy surfaces of triple-bonded RGa≡PR (R = F, OH, H, CH3 , SiH3 , SiMe(SitBu3 )2 , SiiPrDis2 , Tbt (C6 H2 -2,4,6-{CH(SiMe3 )2 }3 ), and Ar* (C6 H3 -2,6-(C6 H2 -2,4,6-i-Pr3 )2 )) compounds was theoretically examined by using density functional theory (i.e., M06-2X/Def2-TZVP, B3PW91/Def2-TZVP, and B3LYP/LANL2DZ+dp). The theoretical evidence strongly suggests that all of the triple-bonded RGa≡PR species prefer to select a bent form with an angle (∠Ga-P-R) of about 90°. Moreover, the theoretical observations indicate that only the bulkier substituents, in particular, for the strong donating groups (e.g., SiMe(SitBu3 )2 and SiiPrDis2 ) can efficiently stabilize the Ga≡P triple bond. In addition, the bonding analyses (based on the natural bond orbital, the natural resonance theory, and the charge decomposition analysis) reveal that the bonding characters of such triple-bonded RGa≡PR molecules should be regarded as [Formula: see text]. In other words, the Ga≡P triple bond involves one traditional σ bond, one traditional π bond, and one donor-acceptor π bond. Accordingly, the theoretical conclusions strongly suggest that the Ga≡P triple bond in such acetylene analogues (RGa≡PR) should be very weak.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app