We have located links that may give you full text access.
Temporal Trends in Airborne Dust Concentrations at a Large Chrysotile Mine and its Asbestos-enrichment Factories in the Russian Federation During 1951-2001.
Annals of Work Exposures and Health 2017 August 2
Objectives: Mining and processing of chrysotile, an established carcinogen, has been undertaken in Asbest, Russian Federation since the late 1800s. Dust concentrations were routinely recorded at the open-pit mine and its asbestos-enrichment factories. We examined the temporal trends in these dust concentrations from 1951 to 2001.
Methods: Analyses included 89290 monthly averaged gravimetric dust concentrations in six factories (1951-2001) and 1457 monthly averaged concentrations in the mine (1964-2001). Annual percent changes (APC) in geometric mean dust concentrations were estimated for each factory and the mine separately from linear mixed models of the logarithmic-transformed monthly averaged concentrations.
Results: Dust concentrations declined significantly in the mine [APC: -1.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.0 to -0.2] and Factories 1-5 but not 6. Overall factory APCs ranged from -30.4% (95% CI: -51.9 to -8.9; Factory 1: 1951-1955) to -0.6% (95% CI: -1.5 to 0.2; Factory 6: 1969-2001). Factory trends varied across decades, with the steepest declines observed before 1960 [APCs: -21.5% (Factory 2) and -17.4% (Factory 3)], more moderate declines in the 1960s and 1970s [APCs from -10% in Factory 2 (1960s) to -0.3% (not statistically significant) in Factory 4 (1970s)], and little change thereafter. Mine dust concentrations increased in the 1960s (APC: +9.7%; 95% CI: 3.6 to 15.9), decreased in the 1990s (APC: -5.8%; 95% CI: -8.1 to -3.5) and were stable in between.
Conclusions: In this analysis of >90000 dust concentrations, factory dust concentrations declined between 1951 and 1979 and then stabilized. In the mine, dust levels increased in the 1960s, declined in the 1990s and were unchanged in the interim.
Methods: Analyses included 89290 monthly averaged gravimetric dust concentrations in six factories (1951-2001) and 1457 monthly averaged concentrations in the mine (1964-2001). Annual percent changes (APC) in geometric mean dust concentrations were estimated for each factory and the mine separately from linear mixed models of the logarithmic-transformed monthly averaged concentrations.
Results: Dust concentrations declined significantly in the mine [APC: -1.6%; 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.0 to -0.2] and Factories 1-5 but not 6. Overall factory APCs ranged from -30.4% (95% CI: -51.9 to -8.9; Factory 1: 1951-1955) to -0.6% (95% CI: -1.5 to 0.2; Factory 6: 1969-2001). Factory trends varied across decades, with the steepest declines observed before 1960 [APCs: -21.5% (Factory 2) and -17.4% (Factory 3)], more moderate declines in the 1960s and 1970s [APCs from -10% in Factory 2 (1960s) to -0.3% (not statistically significant) in Factory 4 (1970s)], and little change thereafter. Mine dust concentrations increased in the 1960s (APC: +9.7%; 95% CI: 3.6 to 15.9), decreased in the 1990s (APC: -5.8%; 95% CI: -8.1 to -3.5) and were stable in between.
Conclusions: In this analysis of >90000 dust concentrations, factory dust concentrations declined between 1951 and 1979 and then stabilized. In the mine, dust levels increased in the 1960s, declined in the 1990s and were unchanged in the interim.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app