We have located links that may give you full text access.
The effect of visual perturbation upon femoral acceleration during the single and bilateral squat.
Physical Therapy in Sport 2017 September
OBJECTIVES: Record femoral accelerations using a smartphone accelerometer attached to the distal thigh during single-legged (SLS) and bilateral squats, and each squat condition occurred under two visual conditions: 1) normal vision and 2) visual perturbation with stroboscopic glasses.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures cross-over with counter-balanced order for four total conditions.
SETTING: Laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: 22 females and 16 males without lower extremity pathologies.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 2D video assessment of frontal plane projection angle, composite amplitude index of smartphone accelerometer measurements, and bivariate correlations between these two outcomes.
RESULTS: A significant interaction was found for stance x vision as the difference occurred within the SLS stance condition between the visual conditions (Normal: 9.85 ± 0.06; Stroboscopic: 9.86 ± 0.07; p = 0.008 with an adjusted alpha of 0.25). Femoral accelerations were not associated (r = -0.07) with 2D video assessment of frontal plane projection angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar to other studies using smartphone accelerometry to assess movement quality, we found that the device could detect movement variation via femoral accelerations during SLS with visual perturbation in healthy individuals.
DESIGN: Repeated-measures cross-over with counter-balanced order for four total conditions.
SETTING: Laboratory.
PARTICIPANTS: 22 females and 16 males without lower extremity pathologies.
MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: 2D video assessment of frontal plane projection angle, composite amplitude index of smartphone accelerometer measurements, and bivariate correlations between these two outcomes.
RESULTS: A significant interaction was found for stance x vision as the difference occurred within the SLS stance condition between the visual conditions (Normal: 9.85 ± 0.06; Stroboscopic: 9.86 ± 0.07; p = 0.008 with an adjusted alpha of 0.25). Femoral accelerations were not associated (r = -0.07) with 2D video assessment of frontal plane projection angle.
CONCLUSIONS: Similar to other studies using smartphone accelerometry to assess movement quality, we found that the device could detect movement variation via femoral accelerations during SLS with visual perturbation in healthy individuals.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app