Fracture of nickel titanium rotary instrument during root canal treatment and re-treatment: a 5-year retrospective study.

AIM: To evaluate retrospectively the incidence of K3 nickel titanium rotary instrument fracture in referred cases during root canal treatment and re-treatment.

METHODOLOGY: Clinical and radiographic reports of 12 867 endodontic cases treated at the King Abdulaziz medical city between January 2010 and November 2015 were reviewed to obtain information on intracanal fractured instruments with respect to the treatment performed, tooth type and the size and at what level the instrument fractured (coronal, middle or apical). The degree of canal curvature was classified into mild (<10° ), moderate (10-25° ) or severe (>25° ). Logistic regression was used to test the incidence of instrument fracture in relation to the root canal treatment performed and tooth type. Chi-square tests were used to analyse the fracture incidence in the treated teeth in respect to fracture level and fractured file diameter. The level of significance was set at 0.05.

RESULTS: Root canal treatment was performed on 8946 cases, whilst re-treatment was performed on 3921 cases. The fracture incidence was higher during re-treatment cases (2.96%) than in primary root canal treatment (0.74%) (P < 0.001) with a 1.41% incidence overall. There was a trend for more fractures in maxillary (1.68%) and mandibular (1.35%) molar teeth. Moreover, 56.6% of the fractured instruments occurred in severely curved canals, and the apical third of the root canal was the most common site for instrument fracture (85.7%), followed by middle (13.2%), and coronal (1.1%) thirds, mostly with file sizes 20 and 25 (59.9% and 25.27%, respectively).

CONCLUSION: The fracture incidence of K3 instruments was significantly greater during root canal re-treatment than root canal treatment, mainly with small instruments and in the apical third of the canals.