We have located links that may give you full text access.
Mechanical Analysis of Extra-Articular Knee Ligaments. Part two: Tendon grafts used for knee ligament reconstruction.
Knee 2017 October
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to provide information about the mechanical properties of grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions and to compare those results with the mechanical properties of native knee ligaments.
METHODS: Eleven cadaveric knees were dissected for the semitendinosus, gracilis, iliotibial band (ITB), quadriceps and patellar tendon. Uniaxial testing to failure was performed using a standardized method and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, strain energy density) were determined.
RESULTS: The elastic modulus of the gracilis tendon (1458±476MPa) (P<0.001) and the semitendinosus tendon (1036±312MPa) (P<0.05) was significantly higher than the ITB (610±171MPa), quadriceps tendon (568±194MPa), and patellar tendon (417±107MPa). In addition, the ultimate stress of the hamstring tendons (gracilis 155.0±30.7MPa and semitendinosus 120.1±30.0MPa) was significantly higher (P<0.001, respectively P<0.05), relative to the ITB (75.0±11.8MPa), quadriceps tendon (81.0±27.6MPa), and patellar tendon (76.2±25.1MPa). A significant difference (P<0.05) could be noticed between the ultimate strain of the patellar tendon (24.6±5.9%) and the hamstrings (gracilis 14.5±3.1% and semitendinosus 17.0±4.0%). No significant difference in strain energy density between the grafts was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Material properties of common grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions often differ significantly from the original knee ligament which the graft is supposed to emulate.
METHODS: Eleven cadaveric knees were dissected for the semitendinosus, gracilis, iliotibial band (ITB), quadriceps and patellar tendon. Uniaxial testing to failure was performed using a standardized method and mechanical properties (elastic modulus, ultimate stress, ultimate strain, strain energy density) were determined.
RESULTS: The elastic modulus of the gracilis tendon (1458±476MPa) (P<0.001) and the semitendinosus tendon (1036±312MPa) (P<0.05) was significantly higher than the ITB (610±171MPa), quadriceps tendon (568±194MPa), and patellar tendon (417±107MPa). In addition, the ultimate stress of the hamstring tendons (gracilis 155.0±30.7MPa and semitendinosus 120.1±30.0MPa) was significantly higher (P<0.001, respectively P<0.05), relative to the ITB (75.0±11.8MPa), quadriceps tendon (81.0±27.6MPa), and patellar tendon (76.2±25.1MPa). A significant difference (P<0.05) could be noticed between the ultimate strain of the patellar tendon (24.6±5.9%) and the hamstrings (gracilis 14.5±3.1% and semitendinosus 17.0±4.0%). No significant difference in strain energy density between the grafts was observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Material properties of common grafts used for knee ligament reconstructions often differ significantly from the original knee ligament which the graft is supposed to emulate.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app