[Comparative relevance of declaration of side effects by patients and health professionals].

INTRODUCTION: Drug-induced adverse events have been accessible to patient's spontaneous reporting in France and such notifications have been steadily increasing since 2011. However, these notifications are still shrouded with medical perplexity and are sometimes subjected to partial caution in their interpretation by the patient's physician. We aimed to evaluate and compare prospectively the relevance of such spontaneous notifications with those provided by healthcare professionals to the French Pharmacovigilance Center of Nice-Alpes-Côte d'Azur.

METHODS: Spontaneous reporting of drug adverse events notified by patients and health care professionals were compared in terms of critical (name, date, effect, drug involved, chronological compatibility) and non-critical (posology, dosage) information, whereas the plausibility of the cases were assessed in weekly multispecialty staffs. Each patient's notification was matched with the immediate pre- and post-notifications declared by health care providers.

RESULTS: Spontaneous notifications from 61 patients were compared with 122 notifications from health care providers. Neither the critical information necessary for declaring the case in the national database (7/61 versus 16/122, P=0.75), nor the uncritical elements allowing to assess the case (30/61 versus 51/122, P=0.22), its plausibility or the causality of the drug (P=0.10) differed significantly between the two groups. 107 cases out of 122 (88%) notified by health care providers were classified as serious, as compared with 19 out of 61 (15%) of patient's ones (P<0.001).

CONCLUSION: Despite concerns from pharmacovigilance specialists in France, the medical relevance of spontaneous reported drug-associated adverse events does not differ from that of health care providers.