We have located links that may give you full text access.
Low Bone-Mineral Density Is a Significant Risk for Proximal Junctional Failure After Surgical Correction of Adult Spinal Deformity: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.
Spine 2018 April 2
STUDY DESIGN: A propensity-matched comparison of risk factors for proximal junctional failure (PJF), which is a symptomatic proximal junctional kyphosis developing after corrective surgery for adult spinal deformity (ASD).
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the role of bone strength for developing PJF.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJF, a devastating complication of corrective surgery for ASD, often recurs even after revision surgery. Most studies of risk factors for PJF are retrospective and have a selection bias in surgical strategy, making it difficult to identify modifiable PJF risk factors.
METHODS: We conducted propensity-matched comparisons of 113 surgically treated ASD patients who were followed for at least 2 years, to elucidate whether low bone-mineral density (BMD) was a true risk factor for PJF in a uniform population from a multicenter database. Patients were grouped as having mildly low to normal BMD (M group; T-score≧ - 1.5) or significantly low BMD (S group; T-score < -1.5), and were propensity-matched for age, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, history of spine surgery, and Schwab-Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) ASD classification. PJF was defined as a ≥20° increase from the baseline proximal junction angle with a concomitant deterioration of at least one SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier grade, or any type of proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision.
RESULTS: PJF developed in 22 of 113 patients (19%). There were 48 propensity-matched patients in the M and S groups (24 in each) with similar parameters for age, body mass index, number of vertebrae involved, C7SVA, pelvic incidence - LL, and SRS-Schwab type. In this propensity-matched population, the incidence of PJF was significantly higher in the S group (33% vs. 8%, P < 0.01, odds ratio 6.4, 95% CI: 1.2-32.3).
CONCLUSION: Low BMD was a significant risk factor for PJF in this propensity-matched cohort (odds ratio 6.4). Surgeons should consider prophylactic treatments when correcting ASD in patients with low BMD.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
OBJECTIVE: To elucidate the role of bone strength for developing PJF.
SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: PJF, a devastating complication of corrective surgery for ASD, often recurs even after revision surgery. Most studies of risk factors for PJF are retrospective and have a selection bias in surgical strategy, making it difficult to identify modifiable PJF risk factors.
METHODS: We conducted propensity-matched comparisons of 113 surgically treated ASD patients who were followed for at least 2 years, to elucidate whether low bone-mineral density (BMD) was a true risk factor for PJF in a uniform population from a multicenter database. Patients were grouped as having mildly low to normal BMD (M group; T-score≧ - 1.5) or significantly low BMD (S group; T-score < -1.5), and were propensity-matched for age, upper and lower instrumented vertebrae, history of spine surgery, and Schwab-Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) ASD classification. PJF was defined as a ≥20° increase from the baseline proximal junction angle with a concomitant deterioration of at least one SRS-Schwab sagittal modifier grade, or any type of proximal junctional kyphosis requiring revision.
RESULTS: PJF developed in 22 of 113 patients (19%). There were 48 propensity-matched patients in the M and S groups (24 in each) with similar parameters for age, body mass index, number of vertebrae involved, C7SVA, pelvic incidence - LL, and SRS-Schwab type. In this propensity-matched population, the incidence of PJF was significantly higher in the S group (33% vs. 8%, P < 0.01, odds ratio 6.4, 95% CI: 1.2-32.3).
CONCLUSION: Low BMD was a significant risk factor for PJF in this propensity-matched cohort (odds ratio 6.4). Surgeons should consider prophylactic treatments when correcting ASD in patients with low BMD.
LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app