Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Exploring the effect of hydroxylic and non-hydroxylic solvents on the reaction of [V IV O(β-diketonate) 2 ] with 2-aminobenzoylhydrazide in aerobic and anaerobic conditions.

Refluxing [VIV O(β-diketonate)2 ], namely [VIV O(acetylacetonate)2 ] and [VIV O(benzoylacetonate)2 ], separately with an equivalent or excess amount of 2-aminobenzoylhydrazide (ah) in laboratory grade (LG) CH3 OH in aerobic conditions afforded non-oxidovanadium(iv) and oxidovanadium(v) complexes of the type [VIV (L1 )2 ] (1), [VV O(L1 )(OCH3 )]2 (3) and [VIV (L2 )2 ] (2), and [VV O(L2 )(OCH3 )] (4), respectively. (L1 )2- and (L2 )2- represent the dianionic forms of 2-aminobenzoylhydrazone of acetylacetone (H2 L1 ) and benzoylacetone (H2 L2 ), respectively, (general abbreviation, H2 L), which was formed by the in situ condensation of ah with the respective coordinated [β-diketonate] in medium-to-good yield. The yield of different resulting products was dependent upon the ratio of ah to [VIV O(β-diketonate)2 ]. For example, the yield of 1 and 2 complexes increased significantly associated with a decrease in the amount of 3 and 4 with an increase in the molar ratio of ah. Upon replacing CH3 OH by a non-hydroxylic solvent, LG CHCl3 , the above reaction yielded only oxidovanadium(v) complexes of the type [VV O(L1 )(OH)]2 (5), [VV O(L2 )(OH)] (6) and [VO3 (L)2 ] (7, 8) whereas, upon replacing CHCl3 by another non-hydroxylic solvent, namely LG CH3 CN, only the respective [VO3 (L)2 ] (7, 8) complex was isolated in 72-78% yield. However, upon performing the above reactions in the absence of air using dry CH3 OH or dry CHCl3 , only the respective [VIV (L)2 ] complex was obtained, suggesting that aerial oxygen was the oxidising agent and the type of pentavalent product formed was dependent upon the nature of solvent used. Complexes 3 and 4 were converted, respectively, to 7 and 8 on refluxing in LG CHCl3 via the respective unstable complex 5 and 6. The DFT calculated change in internal energy (ΔE) for the reactions 2[VV O(L2 )(OCH3 )] + 2H2 O → 2[VV O(L2 )(OH)] + 2CH3 OH and 2[VV O(L2 )(OH)] → [VO3 (L2 )2 ] + H2 O was, respectively, +3.61 and -7.42 kcal mol-1 , suggesting that the [VV O(L2 )(OH)] species was unstable and readily transformed to the stable [VO3 (L2 )2 ] complex. Upon one-electron reduction at an appropriate potential, each of 7 and 8 generated mixed-valence [(L)VV O-(μ-O)-OVIV (L)]- species, which showed valence-delocalisation at room temperature and localisation at 77 K. Some of the complexes showed a wide range of toxicity in a dose-dependent manner against lung cancer cells comparable with that observed with cis-platin.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app