Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Outcomes of Blalock-Taussig shunts in current era: A single center experience.

OBJECTIVES: Mortality associated with the modified Blalock-Taussig shunt (MBTS) remains high despite advanced perioperative management. This study was formulated to provide data on (1) current indications, (2) outcomes, and (3) factors affecting mortality and morbidity.

DESIGN: A retrospective single center chart review identified 95 children (excluding hypoplastic left heart lesions) requiring a MBTS. Mortality and major morbidity were analyzed using the Kaplan Meier method and risk factor analysis using Cox's proportional hazard regression.

RESULTS: Median age was 8 (0-126) days, weight 3.1(1.7-5.4) kg. Seventy-three percent were neonates, 58% duct dependent and 73% had single ventricle physiology. Ninety-seven percent had a sternotomy approach for shunt placement with 70% receiving a 3.5 mm graft. Mean graft index (shunt cross sectional area [mm2 ]/BSA [m2 ]) was 44.39 ± 8.04 and shunt size (mm) to body weight (kg) ratio 1.1 ± 0.2. Hospital mortality was 12%, with an interval mortality of 6%. Shunt thrombosis/stenosis occurred in 23% and pulmonary over circulation in 30%, while shunt reoperation was required in 12% and catheter intervention in 8% of the cohort. At 1-year, survival was 82.0% (95% CI [72.7%, 88.4%]), and survival free of major morbidity 61.4% (95% CI [50.7%, 70.5%]). Duct dependency predisposed to mortality (P = .01, HR 6.74 [1.54, 29.53]) and composite outcome (mortality and major morbidity) (P = .04, HR 2.15, CI [1.036, 4.466]) and higher graft index to mortality (P = .005, HR 1.07 [1.02, 1.12]).

CONCLUSIONS: The commonest indication for a MBTS in the current era was single ventricle palliation. Morbidity and mortality was considerable, partly explained by the higher at risk population. Alternative methods to maintain pulmonary blood flow in place of a MBTS requires further investigation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app