We have located links that may give you full text access.
EVALUATION STUDIES
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RESEARCH SUPPORT, NON-U.S. GOV'T
Clinical Application of a Transurethral Holmium Laser Excision of Exposed Polypropylene Mesh at Lower Urinary Tract: Single Surgeon Experience With Long-term Follow-up.
Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery 2018 January
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical application of a transurethral holmium laser excision of exposed polypropylene mesh as an effective minimally invasive surgical approach in patients with lower urinary tract mesh erosion following the transvaginal placement of polypropylene mesh.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 22 patients with exposed polypropylene mesh in the lower urinary tract that was managed using the transurethral holmium laser technique. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of mesh surgery: a midurethral sling (MUS) group (n = 18) and a pelvic organ prolapse (POP) group (n = 4). The surgical outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The mean time follow-up after the first surgery was 23.2 months, and 14 patients (64%) reported symptomatic improvement. During outpatient follow-up, eroded residual mesh and failed re-epithelialization were discovered in 6 patients. The recurrence rates in the MUS and POP groups after the first surgery were 22% and 50%, respectively. The recurrence-free periods of each group were 30.5 versus 13.5 months, respectively. Whereas 5 patients had successful epithelialization of the surgical wound following the second endoscopic surgery, 1 patient in the POP group required a third endoscopic surgery because of persistent mesh erosion.
CONCLUSIONS: The excision of exposed polypropylene mesh using a transurethral holmium laser following MUS appears to be a feasible option because of potentially low rates of complication and recurrent stress incontinence. However, minimally invasive approach using holmium laser may not be as successful for mesh erosion after transvaginal mesh repair for POP.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the data of 22 patients with exposed polypropylene mesh in the lower urinary tract that was managed using the transurethral holmium laser technique. The patients were divided into 2 groups based on the type of mesh surgery: a midurethral sling (MUS) group (n = 18) and a pelvic organ prolapse (POP) group (n = 4). The surgical outcomes were compared.
RESULTS: The mean time follow-up after the first surgery was 23.2 months, and 14 patients (64%) reported symptomatic improvement. During outpatient follow-up, eroded residual mesh and failed re-epithelialization were discovered in 6 patients. The recurrence rates in the MUS and POP groups after the first surgery were 22% and 50%, respectively. The recurrence-free periods of each group were 30.5 versus 13.5 months, respectively. Whereas 5 patients had successful epithelialization of the surgical wound following the second endoscopic surgery, 1 patient in the POP group required a third endoscopic surgery because of persistent mesh erosion.
CONCLUSIONS: The excision of exposed polypropylene mesh using a transurethral holmium laser following MUS appears to be a feasible option because of potentially low rates of complication and recurrent stress incontinence. However, minimally invasive approach using holmium laser may not be as successful for mesh erosion after transvaginal mesh repair for POP.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Ten Influential Point-of-Care Ultrasound Papers: 2023 in Review.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 Februrary 20
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app