We have located links that may give you full text access.
Structured pain management reduces patient discomfort after catheter ablation and rhythm device surgery.
European Journal of Pain : EJP 2017 November
BACKGROUND: The goal was to test the effectiveness of a structured pain management programme after invasive electrophysiological interventions in cardiology including ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) or ventricular tachycardia (VT) and implantation, or explantation, of pacemakers or implantable cardioverter defibrillators.
METHODS: This was a prospective study with a pre-/post-design where a post-intervention group (116 consecutive patients) was compared to a pre-intervention group (102 consecutive patients) after implementation of a structured pain-management programme using the numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) and classified as moderate-to-severe if NRS > 3. Measurements were recorded every two hours during the first 24 h post-operatively. The location of the pain and the amount of analgesic used were also recorded.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain after the procedure decreased after initiation of the pain-management program: 47% versus 61%; p = 0.048. This difference was driven primarily by reduced pain late (8-24 h) after the procedure; 16% versus 39%; p < 0.001. The risk to develop late (8-24 h) post-procedural pain was reduced approximately three-fold after implementation of the pain-management programme (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated chronic pain, early pain (0-6 h), and type of intervention were associated with late post-interventional pain. In contrast, age, diabetes mellitus, BMI, gender and procedure time were not related.
CONCLUSION: The findings illustrate the potential value of a structured pain-management programme. The proportion of patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain after these electrophysiological procedures decreased significantly.
SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first exploratory study that evaluates the impact of a multidisciplinary pain-management programme after cardiac electrophysiological interventions. It demonstrates that significant quality improvement is achievable following simple rules together with patient and staff education. The programme reduces the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe pain after electrophysiological procedures significantly.
METHODS: This was a prospective study with a pre-/post-design where a post-intervention group (116 consecutive patients) was compared to a pre-intervention group (102 consecutive patients) after implementation of a structured pain-management programme using the numeric rating scale (NRS 0-10) and classified as moderate-to-severe if NRS > 3. Measurements were recorded every two hours during the first 24 h post-operatively. The location of the pain and the amount of analgesic used were also recorded.
RESULTS: The proportion of patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain after the procedure decreased after initiation of the pain-management program: 47% versus 61%; p = 0.048. This difference was driven primarily by reduced pain late (8-24 h) after the procedure; 16% versus 39%; p < 0.001. The risk to develop late (8-24 h) post-procedural pain was reduced approximately three-fold after implementation of the pain-management programme (OR = 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.64, p = 0.001). Multivariate analysis indicated chronic pain, early pain (0-6 h), and type of intervention were associated with late post-interventional pain. In contrast, age, diabetes mellitus, BMI, gender and procedure time were not related.
CONCLUSION: The findings illustrate the potential value of a structured pain-management programme. The proportion of patients who experienced moderate-to-severe pain after these electrophysiological procedures decreased significantly.
SIGNIFICANCE: This is the first exploratory study that evaluates the impact of a multidisciplinary pain-management programme after cardiac electrophysiological interventions. It demonstrates that significant quality improvement is achievable following simple rules together with patient and staff education. The programme reduces the proportion of patients with moderate-to-severe pain after electrophysiological procedures significantly.
Full text links
Trending Papers
Acute and non-acute decompensation of liver cirrhosis (47/130).Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver 2024 March 2
Guide to Utilization of the Microbiology Laboratory for Diagnosis of Infectious Diseases: 2024 Update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and the American Society for Microbiology (ASM).Clinical Infectious Diseases 2024 March 6
Status epilepticus: what's new for the intensivist.Current Opinion in Critical Care 2024 Februrary 15
Administration of methylene blue in septic shock: pros and cons.Critical Care : the Official Journal of the Critical Care Forum 2024 Februrary 17
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app