COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

A Biomechanical Comparison of Extensor Carpi Ulnaris Subsheath Reconstruction Techniques.

PURPOSE: Several surgical stabilization techniques have been described to address pathological subluxation of the extensor carpi ulnaris (ECU) tendon, with no comparative data available. This study compares ECU stability after subsheath reconstruction, with and without ulnar groove deepening, to stability with an intact subsheath in a cadaveric model.

METHODS: Position of the ECU tendon relative to the ulnar groove was measured in 5 human cadaveric specimens with the subsheath intact, sectioned, and after 3 reconstruction scenarios: reconstructed, reconstructed with ulnar groove deepened, and ulnar groove deepened with subsheath sectioned. Position of the tendon relative to the radial side of the ulnar groove was recorded with digital calipers in 9 combinations of wrist/forearm positions (wrist flexion, extension, and neutral; forearm pronation, supination, and neutral). Dislocation events, defined as the tendon being completely ulnar to the groove, were recorded.

RESULTS: Extensor carpi ulnaris tendon displacement was not significantly different between intact subsheath, subsheath reconstruction, and reconstruction with groove deepening (1.5 mm vs 0.5 mm vs -0.3). Extensor carpi ulnaris tendon displacement after groove deepening with the subsheath sectioned was not significantly different from displacement with a fully sectioned subsheath. Sectioning of the subsheath induced dislocation events of the ECU tendon in multiple positions. Subsheath reconstruction with and without groove deepening allowed no dislocation events.

CONCLUSIONS: In this cadaveric model, groove deepening did not improve stability of the ECU tendon compared with the reconstructed subsheath, and reconstruction alone was equally effective at eliminating dislocation events.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Stabilization techniques that focus on restoration of the important ulnar attachment of the ECU subsheath are favored over routine deepening of the ulnar groove in attempts to stabilize the ECU tendon.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app