We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Greater Sensitivity of Oral Fibroblasts to Smoked Versus Smokeless Tobacco.
Journal of Periodontology 2017 December
BACKGROUND: Smokers have an increased incidence and severity of periodontal disease. Although cigarette smoke contains >4,000 chemical components that could affect periodontal tissues, less is understood about the effect of smokeless tobacco. Therefore, this study compares the effects of cigarette smoke extract (CSE) and smokeless tobacco extract (STE) on cell survival and motility of periodontal ligament (PDL) and gingival fibroblasts in vitro.
METHODS: PDL and gingival fibroblasts were exposed to various concentrations of CSE, STE, or nicotine alone. Viable cells were labeled with calcein acetoxymethyl, visualized using fluorescent microscopy, and quantified using a fluorescence multi-well plate reader. In vitro wounding and collagen gel contraction assays were used to assess cell motility.
RESULTS: Both gingival and PDL fibroblasts displayed reduced cell viability with increasing concentrations of CSE and STE. Based on relative nicotine content, CSE was significantly more cytotoxic than STE. PDL fibroblasts were also more sensitive to both CSE and STE compared with gingival fibroblasts. Finally, sublethal doses of CSE reduced cell motility and gel contraction, whereas STE had less effect. Nicotine alone ≤0.5 mM had little to no effect in any of these assays.
CONCLUSIONS: Many of the underlying effects of tobacco products on periodontal tissues may be due to direct inhibition of normal fibroblast function. CSE is found to be more deleterious to the function of both PDL and gingival fibroblasts than STE. PDL fibroblasts appear to be more sensitive to CSE and STE than gingival fibroblasts. Therefore, cigarette smoke may have more profound effects than smokeless tobacco.
METHODS: PDL and gingival fibroblasts were exposed to various concentrations of CSE, STE, or nicotine alone. Viable cells were labeled with calcein acetoxymethyl, visualized using fluorescent microscopy, and quantified using a fluorescence multi-well plate reader. In vitro wounding and collagen gel contraction assays were used to assess cell motility.
RESULTS: Both gingival and PDL fibroblasts displayed reduced cell viability with increasing concentrations of CSE and STE. Based on relative nicotine content, CSE was significantly more cytotoxic than STE. PDL fibroblasts were also more sensitive to both CSE and STE compared with gingival fibroblasts. Finally, sublethal doses of CSE reduced cell motility and gel contraction, whereas STE had less effect. Nicotine alone ≤0.5 mM had little to no effect in any of these assays.
CONCLUSIONS: Many of the underlying effects of tobacco products on periodontal tissues may be due to direct inhibition of normal fibroblast function. CSE is found to be more deleterious to the function of both PDL and gingival fibroblasts than STE. PDL fibroblasts appear to be more sensitive to CSE and STE than gingival fibroblasts. Therefore, cigarette smoke may have more profound effects than smokeless tobacco.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app