COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Comparative Evaluation of Bladder-specific Health-related Quality of Life Instruments for Bladder Cancer.

Urology 2017 October
OBJECTIVE: To compare 2 bladder cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments (HRQOL) in the same patient population. Previous HRQOL studies in cystectomy patients have yielded conflicting results. Using a cross-sectional study design, we examined the only 2 validated bladder cancer-specific (HRQOL) measures.

METHODS: Of the 256 patients who had undergone radical cystectomy from 2009 to 2014, 131 met both inclusion and exclusion criteria. The Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy-Vanderbilt Cystectomy Index (FACT-VCI) and Bladder Cancer Index (BCI) were mailed to these patients. Overall HRQOL and individual domain scores were compared between the 2 instruments with a Spearman correlation coefficient. HRQOL scores were compared by urinary diversion type as well using a non-parametric Wilcoxon rank sum test.

RESULTS: Our study had a response rate of 49% from 31 ileal conduit (IC) and 33 orthotopic neobladder patients. Overall, there was a moderate correlation between the FACT-VCI and BCI surveys (r = 0.57, P <.001). Responses on the BCI domains were strongly correlated with responses on the bladder cancer-specific domain of the FACT-VCI (r = 0.74, P <.001). The BCI scores for urinary function were significantly better in the IC group (P = .002). No significant difference was found between IC and orthotopic neobladder using the FACT-VCI.

CONCLUSION: The FACT-VCI and BCI instruments correlate well within the same patient cohort but capture different aspects of HRQOL. By focusing exclusively on bladder cancer treatment concerns, the BCI appears to be a better tool for assessing and counseling patients on expected treatment-specific changes after diversion type.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app