We have located links that may give you full text access.
COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Dosimetric comparison of RapidPlan and manually optimized plans in volumetric modulated arc therapy for prostate cancer.
Physica Medica : PM 2017 December
PURPOSE: This study evaluated whether RapidPlan based plans (RP plans) created by a single optimization, are usable in volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for patients with prostate cancer.
METHODS: We used 51 previously administered VMAT plans to train a RP model. Thirty RP plans were created by a single optimization without planner intervention during optimization. Differences between RP plans and clinical manual optimization (CMO) plans created by an experienced planner for the same patients were analyzed (Wilcoxon tests) in terms of homogeneity index (HI), conformation number (CN), D95% , and D2% to planning target volume (PTV), mean dose, V50Gy , V70Gy , V75Gy , and V78Gy to rectum and bladder, monitor unit (MU), and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) sequence complexity.
RESULTS: RP and CMO values for PTV D95% , PTV D2% , HI, and CN were significantly similar (p<0.05 for all). RP mean dose, V50Gy , and V70Gy to rectum were superior or comparable to CMO values; RP V75Gy and V78Gy were higher than in CMO plans (p<0.05). RP bladder dose-volume parameter values (except V78Gy ) were lower than in CMO plans (p<0.05). MU values were RP: 730±55MU and CMO: 580±37MU (p<0.05); and MLC sequence complexity scores were RP: 0.25±0.02 and CMO: 0.35±0.03 (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: RP plans created by a single optimization were clinically acceptable in VMAT for patient with prostate cancer. Our simple model could reduce optimization time, independently of planner's skill and knowledge.
METHODS: We used 51 previously administered VMAT plans to train a RP model. Thirty RP plans were created by a single optimization without planner intervention during optimization. Differences between RP plans and clinical manual optimization (CMO) plans created by an experienced planner for the same patients were analyzed (Wilcoxon tests) in terms of homogeneity index (HI), conformation number (CN), D95% , and D2% to planning target volume (PTV), mean dose, V50Gy , V70Gy , V75Gy , and V78Gy to rectum and bladder, monitor unit (MU), and multi-leaf collimator (MLC) sequence complexity.
RESULTS: RP and CMO values for PTV D95% , PTV D2% , HI, and CN were significantly similar (p<0.05 for all). RP mean dose, V50Gy , and V70Gy to rectum were superior or comparable to CMO values; RP V75Gy and V78Gy were higher than in CMO plans (p<0.05). RP bladder dose-volume parameter values (except V78Gy ) were lower than in CMO plans (p<0.05). MU values were RP: 730±55MU and CMO: 580±37MU (p<0.05); and MLC sequence complexity scores were RP: 0.25±0.02 and CMO: 0.35±0.03 (p<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: RP plans created by a single optimization were clinically acceptable in VMAT for patient with prostate cancer. Our simple model could reduce optimization time, independently of planner's skill and knowledge.
Full text links
Trending Papers
A Personalized Approach to the Management of Congestion in Acute Heart Failure.Heart International 2023
Potential Mechanisms of the Protective Effects of the Cardiometabolic Drugs Type-2 Sodium-Glucose Transporter Inhibitors and Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists in Heart Failure.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 Februrary 21
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app