We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Observational Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Restrictive Use of Oral Glucocorticoids in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus and Prevention of Damage Without Worsening Long-Term Disease Control: An Observational Study.
Arthritis Care & Research 2018 April
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the influence of 2 different treatment strategies on general and specific damage accrual in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).
METHODS: Two cohorts were identified according to the responsible physicians: patients treated at the autoimmune diseases unit (ADU), and patients treated by other members of the internal medicine (IM) department. Members of the ADU worked with a protocol including the universal prescription of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the use of maximum oral prednisone dosages ≤30 mg/day and maintenance therapy with ≤5 mg/day, by using methylprednisolone pulses and/or early immunosuppressive (IS) drugs. We analyzed the influence of these 2 treatment strategies on damage accrual, both general and domain specific, attributed to glucocorticoids, cardiovascular (CV) disease, SLE, and unclassified, since the diagnosis of disease in patients with a followup ≥5 years.
RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were included in the ADU group and 213 in the IM group. They were comparable for most demographic and lupus-related variables. ADU patients received prednisone later and at lower doses, more methylprednisolone pulses, earlier IS drugs and more HCQ (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score decreased similarly in both cohorts (P = 0.4). Patients in the ADU group were less likely to accrue any damage (P = 0.007). They accrued less glucocorticoid-related (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.23 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.07-0.80]), CV disease (adjusted HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.08-0.95]), and unclassified damage (adjusted HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.3-1.1]). Both groups accrued similar SLE-related damage (adjusted HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.40-1.75]).
CONCLUSION: The use of reduced oral prednisone doses, which was possible by combining different therapies, reduced glucocorticoid-related damage and improved CV prognosis without increasing damage caused by SLE.
METHODS: Two cohorts were identified according to the responsible physicians: patients treated at the autoimmune diseases unit (ADU), and patients treated by other members of the internal medicine (IM) department. Members of the ADU worked with a protocol including the universal prescription of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ), the use of maximum oral prednisone dosages ≤30 mg/day and maintenance therapy with ≤5 mg/day, by using methylprednisolone pulses and/or early immunosuppressive (IS) drugs. We analyzed the influence of these 2 treatment strategies on damage accrual, both general and domain specific, attributed to glucocorticoids, cardiovascular (CV) disease, SLE, and unclassified, since the diagnosis of disease in patients with a followup ≥5 years.
RESULTS: A total of 74 patients were included in the ADU group and 213 in the IM group. They were comparable for most demographic and lupus-related variables. ADU patients received prednisone later and at lower doses, more methylprednisolone pulses, earlier IS drugs and more HCQ (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index score decreased similarly in both cohorts (P = 0.4). Patients in the ADU group were less likely to accrue any damage (P = 0.007). They accrued less glucocorticoid-related (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.23 [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.07-0.80]), CV disease (adjusted HR 0.28 [95% CI 0.08-0.95]), and unclassified damage (adjusted HR 0.58 [95% CI 0.3-1.1]). Both groups accrued similar SLE-related damage (adjusted HR 0.84 [95% CI 0.40-1.75]).
CONCLUSION: The use of reduced oral prednisone doses, which was possible by combining different therapies, reduced glucocorticoid-related damage and improved CV prognosis without increasing damage caused by SLE.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app