We have located links that may give you full text access.
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Prognostic significance of tumor-associated macrophages in ovarian cancer: A meta-analysis.
Gynecologic Oncology 2017 October
OBJECTIVE: The role of tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) in tumor microenvironment remains controversial due to the two different polarized subsets of TAMs. Here, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the correlation between subpopulations of TAMs and clinical outcomes in patients with ovarian cancer.
METHODS: A comprehensive search in PUBMED/Medline and EMBASE databases was performed. The association between TAMs and patient prognosis of ovarian cancer was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effect model. Additionally, sensitivity analysis and Begg's test were conducted.
RESULTS: Nine studies including 794 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. The results showed that higher M1/M2 ratio in tumor tissues was associated with a favorable overall survival (OS) (HR=0.449, 95% CI=0.283-0.712, P=0.001). Elevated intra-islet M1/M2 TAMs ratio showed a positive correlation for OS (HR=0.510, 95% CI=0.264-0.986, P=0.045). No significant relation was observed between OS and CD68+ TAMs (HR=0.99, 95% CI=0.88-1.11, P=0.859), CD163+ TAMs (HR=1.04, 95% CI=0.92-1.16, P=0.544) or CD163+/CD68+ TAMs ratio (HR=1.628, 95% CI=0.529-5.008, P=0.395). Worse progression-free survival (PFS) was associated with high density of CD163+ TAMs (HR=2.157, 95% CI=1.406-3.312, P=0.000) and higher ratio of CD163+/CD68+ TAMs (HR=3.223, 95% CI=1.805-5.755, P=0.000). Elevated M1/M2 TAMs ratio predicted better PFS of ovarian cancer (HR=0.490, 95% CI=0.270-0.890, P=0.019). Furthermore, high density of CD163+ and CD68+ TAMs was observed in ovarian cancer with advanced TNM stage.
CONCLUSION: In our study, it was revealed that CD163+ TAMs infiltration was associated with poor prognosis of ovarian cancer and high M1/M2 macrophages ratio in tumor tissues predicted better prognosis.
METHODS: A comprehensive search in PUBMED/Medline and EMBASE databases was performed. The association between TAMs and patient prognosis of ovarian cancer was estimated with hazard ratios (HRs) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effect model. Additionally, sensitivity analysis and Begg's test were conducted.
RESULTS: Nine studies including 794 patients were enrolled in the meta-analysis. The results showed that higher M1/M2 ratio in tumor tissues was associated with a favorable overall survival (OS) (HR=0.449, 95% CI=0.283-0.712, P=0.001). Elevated intra-islet M1/M2 TAMs ratio showed a positive correlation for OS (HR=0.510, 95% CI=0.264-0.986, P=0.045). No significant relation was observed between OS and CD68+ TAMs (HR=0.99, 95% CI=0.88-1.11, P=0.859), CD163+ TAMs (HR=1.04, 95% CI=0.92-1.16, P=0.544) or CD163+/CD68+ TAMs ratio (HR=1.628, 95% CI=0.529-5.008, P=0.395). Worse progression-free survival (PFS) was associated with high density of CD163+ TAMs (HR=2.157, 95% CI=1.406-3.312, P=0.000) and higher ratio of CD163+/CD68+ TAMs (HR=3.223, 95% CI=1.805-5.755, P=0.000). Elevated M1/M2 TAMs ratio predicted better PFS of ovarian cancer (HR=0.490, 95% CI=0.270-0.890, P=0.019). Furthermore, high density of CD163+ and CD68+ TAMs was observed in ovarian cancer with advanced TNM stage.
CONCLUSION: In our study, it was revealed that CD163+ TAMs infiltration was associated with poor prognosis of ovarian cancer and high M1/M2 macrophages ratio in tumor tissues predicted better prognosis.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app