Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Different information by MRI compare to ultrasound in fetal intracranial space occupying lesions.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of prenatal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in characterizing fetal intracranial space occupying lesions in comparison to prenatal ultrasound.

METHODS: This retrospective study included 50 fetuses (mean age 26 years, mean gestational weeks 31 + 1 GW) with intracranial space occupying lesions, suspected by prenatal screening ultrasound. T2-weighted, T1-weighted, SSFP, and diffusion-weighted sequences of the fetal brain were obtained on a 1.5 T unit. Pathology (n = 5), postmortem MRI (n = 3), or postnatal US (n = 42) was available as standard of reference.

RESULTS: The fetal MRI provided correct diagnosis in 49 cases (98%), while 35 (70%) by ultrasound, and MRI failed in 1 case (2%), while ultrasound failed in 15 cases (30%). Fetal MR and ultrasound were concordant in 35 of 50 cases (70%), completely discordant in 4 (8%), and partially discordant in 11 (22%) cases.

CONCLUSIONS: MRI could provide detailed information about the minor lesions, such as focal hemorrhage and periventricular nodules. Meanwhile, it could provide whole view of the lesion in order to delineate the surrounding anatomical structure. But there are still some limitations of its soft-tissue resolution in a case with teratoma; more effort is needed to improve the sequences.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app