We have located links that may give you full text access.
Diagnostic Value of Contrast-Enhanced Ultrasonography and Time-Intensity Curve in Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Metastatic and Tuberculous Lymph Nodes.
Journal of Ultrasound in Medicine : Official Journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine 2018 January
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the diagnostic value of contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) in the differential diagnosis of tuberculous and metastatic lymph nodes.
METHODS: Nineteen cervical tuberculous lymph nodes and 43 cervical metastatic lymph nodes were investigated. The CEUS perfusion patterns and parameters of time-intensity curve (TIC) were analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy and consistency of two physicians were compared before and after CEUS and TIC analysis.
RESULTS: Conventional ultrasonography showed no significant differences between tuberculous and metastatic lymph nodes. Concentric enhancement at the arterial phase of CEUS occurred in 15 of 19 (78.9%) tuberculous lymph nodes and 42 of 43 (97.7%) metastatic lymph nodes (P < .05). For the TIC curve, a steep descending curve with an apparent notch was commonly found in tuberculous lymph nodes (13 of 16). Although a shallow descending curve was common (40 of 43) in metastatic lymph nodes, most did not have a notch on the curve (39 of 43) (P < .01). The k-value and the peak intensity (PI) value of tuberculous lymph nodes were significantly higher and the △PI value was significantly lower than that of metastatic lymph nodes (P < .05, respectively). Kappa values for the diagnosis consistency of the two physicians before and after CEUS and TIC analysis were 0.582 and 0.761, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy before and after CEUS and TIC analysis was 47.4% (28 of 59) and 96.6% (57 of 59), respectively (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with TIC analysis is helpful in differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymph nodes.
METHODS: Nineteen cervical tuberculous lymph nodes and 43 cervical metastatic lymph nodes were investigated. The CEUS perfusion patterns and parameters of time-intensity curve (TIC) were analyzed. Diagnostic accuracy and consistency of two physicians were compared before and after CEUS and TIC analysis.
RESULTS: Conventional ultrasonography showed no significant differences between tuberculous and metastatic lymph nodes. Concentric enhancement at the arterial phase of CEUS occurred in 15 of 19 (78.9%) tuberculous lymph nodes and 42 of 43 (97.7%) metastatic lymph nodes (P < .05). For the TIC curve, a steep descending curve with an apparent notch was commonly found in tuberculous lymph nodes (13 of 16). Although a shallow descending curve was common (40 of 43) in metastatic lymph nodes, most did not have a notch on the curve (39 of 43) (P < .01). The k-value and the peak intensity (PI) value of tuberculous lymph nodes were significantly higher and the △PI value was significantly lower than that of metastatic lymph nodes (P < .05, respectively). Kappa values for the diagnosis consistency of the two physicians before and after CEUS and TIC analysis were 0.582 and 0.761, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy before and after CEUS and TIC analysis was 47.4% (28 of 59) and 96.6% (57 of 59), respectively (P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography with TIC analysis is helpful in differentiating tuberculous from metastatic lymph nodes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app