We have located links that may give you full text access.
Comparative Study
Evaluation Studies
Journal Article
Fluorodeoxyglucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography performs better than contrast-enhanced computed tomography for metastasis evaluation in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
Annals of Nuclear Medicine 2017 October
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the additional role of FDG-PET/CT to the conventional multiphasic CECT in the initial staging of pancreatic adenocarcinoma.
METHODS: 54 patients diagnosed with pathologically proven pancreatic malignancy underwent FDG-PET/CECT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT for nodal and metastatic staging were calculated. The statistical difference was calculated by McNemar's test.
RESULTS: Of 54 patients, 15 had distal metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT for nodal staging were 33 vs 89%, 84 vs 100%, 67 vs 100%, 60 vs 90%, and 59 vs 95%, respectively, p < 0.001. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CECT for metastatic staging were 73, 87, 69, 89, and 83%, whereas the accuracy of PET/CT was 100%, p = 0.01. By correctly characterizing unsuspected distant lesions, PET/CT could change management in 19% of patients.
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT can contribute to change in the management in almost one of every five patients of PA evaluated with the standard investigations during the initial staging.
METHODS: 54 patients diagnosed with pathologically proven pancreatic malignancy underwent FDG-PET/CECT. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT for nodal and metastatic staging were calculated. The statistical difference was calculated by McNemar's test.
RESULTS: Of 54 patients, 15 had distal metastasis. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of PET/CT and CECT for nodal staging were 33 vs 89%, 84 vs 100%, 67 vs 100%, 60 vs 90%, and 59 vs 95%, respectively, p < 0.001. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and accuracy of CECT for metastatic staging were 73, 87, 69, 89, and 83%, whereas the accuracy of PET/CT was 100%, p = 0.01. By correctly characterizing unsuspected distant lesions, PET/CT could change management in 19% of patients.
CONCLUSION: FDG-PET/CT can contribute to change in the management in almost one of every five patients of PA evaluated with the standard investigations during the initial staging.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app