We have located links that may give you full text access.
CASE REPORTS
JOURNAL ARTICLE
Late reconstruction of severe open-book deformities of the pelvis - tips and tricks.
International Orthopaedics 2017 September
BACKGROUND: The primary goal of treatment for open book pelvic injuries after high-energy trauma is to control haemorrhage and to close the pelvic ring anatomically. Less commonly, patients may present late with malunion or non-union.
METHODS: We reviewed five operatively treated patients with delayed severe open book deformities who had a diastasis of more than 6 cm. We describe the pre-operative workup, surgical strategy and challenges experienced. They specifically include: extensive scar and contracture formation, malunion, urogenital prolapse and difficult reduction of vertical shear element. A 5 to 15-point clinical scoring system based on quality of life regarding pain, ambulation, social function, continence control and presence of prolapse is proposed.
RESULTS: One elderly patient had early mortality after surgery. The other four patients had quality of life improvement by 3 to 5 points after one year. Correction is often clinically successful despite technical challenges and unpredictable radiological results.
CONCLUSION: External fixator and the C-clamp are good reduction tools. Powerful implants should be used and fixation of the posterior ring is mandatory. Staged urogenital and pelvic floor reconstruction is recommended before bony reconstruction to minimize the risk of wound contamination. Patients receiving this complex procedure have a good chance for improvement in pain and functional status.
METHODS: We reviewed five operatively treated patients with delayed severe open book deformities who had a diastasis of more than 6 cm. We describe the pre-operative workup, surgical strategy and challenges experienced. They specifically include: extensive scar and contracture formation, malunion, urogenital prolapse and difficult reduction of vertical shear element. A 5 to 15-point clinical scoring system based on quality of life regarding pain, ambulation, social function, continence control and presence of prolapse is proposed.
RESULTS: One elderly patient had early mortality after surgery. The other four patients had quality of life improvement by 3 to 5 points after one year. Correction is often clinically successful despite technical challenges and unpredictable radiological results.
CONCLUSION: External fixator and the C-clamp are good reduction tools. Powerful implants should be used and fixation of the posterior ring is mandatory. Staged urogenital and pelvic floor reconstruction is recommended before bony reconstruction to minimize the risk of wound contamination. Patients receiving this complex procedure have a good chance for improvement in pain and functional status.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app