If We Don't Ask, Our Patients Might Never Tell: The Impact of the Routine Use of a Patient Values Assessment.

PURPOSE: Good communication can be associated with better end-of-life outcomes. The US Oncology Network developed and tested a Values Assessment (VA) for facilitating advance care planning (ACP). The results of the first 1,268 patients are reported.

METHODS: The VA consists of 10 questions of the format "How valuable is it to me to…" (eg, "...know that I am not a burden to my family, friends, or helpers?"). Responses were on a four-point scale from unsure to very valuable. VA data on 1,286 patients with metastatic cancer from April 1, 2013, to July 31, 2015, were extracted from the electronic health record, including demographics, diagnosis, stage, chemotherapy, and outcomes (hospice enrollment, place of death). These demographics were compared by using the χ2 or Fisher's exact test or the Wilcoxon rank sum test for continuous variables.

RESULTS: A total of 1,268 patients completed the VA (56.7% were ≥ 65 years of age, 57.8% completed advance directives [ADs]). There were 438 deaths of which 308 had a place of death or a hospice enrollment recorded. Of these, 78% died at home or inpatient hospice; 14.6% died in the hospital. Hospice enrollment with ADs was 76.1% and without, 60.9%. Median length of stay in hospice was 21 days with ADs versus 12.5 days without. Chemotherapy in the last 14 days of life was 8.8% with ADs and 15.5% without. The VA was well accepted by patients.

CONCLUSION: A VA as a routine part of practice is feasible and scalable. It facilitates ACP discussions that lead to ADs. The results suggest that VA and ACP lead to less-aggressive care at the end of life.