We have located links that may give you full text access.
Splicing regulators in endothelial cell differentiation.
Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine 2017 October
AIMS: Alternative splicing represents a key mechanism of gene regulation. Despite its role in regulating cell pluripotency and differentiation being well known, the underlining mechanisms are still poorly studied. Here, we investigated the possible involvement of splicing regulators during the different steps of endothelial cell differentiation through expression studies on human circulating progenitors.
METHODS: Total RNAs were extracted from all cells and reverse-transcribed. Semiquantitative and real-time RT-PCR was performed using selective oligonucleotides. Differences between group means were considered significant at P value less than 0.05 and more significant at P value less than 0.01. Protein extracts were incubated with an antibody directed against MED23. Immunoprecipitation of supernatants and pellets was probed with both anti-Muscleblind-like splicing regulator (MBNL)1 and anti-MBNL2 antibodies.
RESULTS: Several clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of progenitor cells in regenerative therapy of the cardiovascular system. Particularly, we analyzed the expression of genes belonging to muscleblind family members and MED complex subunits, which are known to be involved during differentiation in other models. This study shows that MED23, MBNL1 and MBNL2 were all expressed at high levels only in differentiated cells. Moreover, immunoprecipitation assays indicated that MED23 is able to bind MBNLs in endothelial cells.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that MED23, MBNL1 and MBNL2 could regulate alternative splicing events activated during differentiation through a common mechanism. Hence, these observations corroborate previous evidence that splicing regulators may have an essential role in the basic apparatus required for cell pluripotency and reprogramming, allowing identification of novel biomarkers to use for early diagnosis in cardiovascular diseases.
METHODS: Total RNAs were extracted from all cells and reverse-transcribed. Semiquantitative and real-time RT-PCR was performed using selective oligonucleotides. Differences between group means were considered significant at P value less than 0.05 and more significant at P value less than 0.01. Protein extracts were incubated with an antibody directed against MED23. Immunoprecipitation of supernatants and pellets was probed with both anti-Muscleblind-like splicing regulator (MBNL)1 and anti-MBNL2 antibodies.
RESULTS: Several clinical trials demonstrated the safety and efficacy of progenitor cells in regenerative therapy of the cardiovascular system. Particularly, we analyzed the expression of genes belonging to muscleblind family members and MED complex subunits, which are known to be involved during differentiation in other models. This study shows that MED23, MBNL1 and MBNL2 were all expressed at high levels only in differentiated cells. Moreover, immunoprecipitation assays indicated that MED23 is able to bind MBNLs in endothelial cells.
CONCLUSION: Our data suggest that MED23, MBNL1 and MBNL2 could regulate alternative splicing events activated during differentiation through a common mechanism. Hence, these observations corroborate previous evidence that splicing regulators may have an essential role in the basic apparatus required for cell pluripotency and reprogramming, allowing identification of novel biomarkers to use for early diagnosis in cardiovascular diseases.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: diagnosis, risk assessment, and treatment.Clinical Research in Cardiology : Official Journal of the German Cardiac Society 2024 April 12
Proximal versus distal diuretics in congestive heart failure.Nephrology, Dialysis, Transplantation 2024 Februrary 30
Efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy in chronic insomnia: A review of clinical guidelines and case reports.Mental Health Clinician 2023 October
World Health Organization and International Consensus Classification of eosinophilic disorders: 2024 update on diagnosis, risk stratification, and management.American Journal of Hematology 2024 March 30
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app