We have located links that may give you full text access.
Efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in the induction therapy of TNF-α-refractory Crohn's disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research 2017 October
AIM: The aim of the systematic review and meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy and safety of ustekinumab in the induction therapy of anti-TNF-α failure patients with Crohn's disease.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library until 30 December 2016. We included randomized controlled trials that compared efficacy (clinical response and remission) and safety profile of ustekinumab in TNF-α failure Crohn's disease patients; primary and secondary TNF-α nonresponders or intolerant patients were also assessed. Included studies were critically appraised according to the PRISMA statement protocol; data aggregation with a RevMan(®) software was performed.
RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials were revealed in the systematic review but only two of them (CERTIFI and UNITI-1) were homogenous to be included in the meta-analysis; aggregation of data only for induction phase of therapy was possible. Clinical response was significantly higher for patients who received ustekinumab compared with placebo patients in a group of TNF-α antagonist failure patients (relative benefit [RB] = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.28-2.04) and in the following subgroups: secondary nonresponders (RB = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.49-2.63), intolerant patients (RB = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.01-2.13) and patients who failed at least two TNF-α antagonists (RB = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.53-3.14) but in case of primary nonresponders it occurred insignificant (RB = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.76-1.98). The clinical remission in TNF-α antagonist failure population was significantly higher for patients who received ustekinumab compared with placebo (RB = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.17-2.53). Pooled analysis revealed that risk of adverse events in induction phase of therapy was not significantly different (risk ratio = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.86-1.06) between ustekinumab and placebo groups.
CONCLUSION: The clinical response was significantly higher for TNF-α antagonist failure patients who received ustekinumab as well as in subgroups of secondary nonresponders or intolerant patients but not in case of primary nonresponders. Ustekinumab occurred as safe as placebo in the induction as well as in a maintenance phase of therapy.
METHODS: A systematic literature search was conducted in Medline (PubMed), EMBASE, Cochrane Library until 30 December 2016. We included randomized controlled trials that compared efficacy (clinical response and remission) and safety profile of ustekinumab in TNF-α failure Crohn's disease patients; primary and secondary TNF-α nonresponders or intolerant patients were also assessed. Included studies were critically appraised according to the PRISMA statement protocol; data aggregation with a RevMan(®) software was performed.
RESULTS: Three randomized controlled trials were revealed in the systematic review but only two of them (CERTIFI and UNITI-1) were homogenous to be included in the meta-analysis; aggregation of data only for induction phase of therapy was possible. Clinical response was significantly higher for patients who received ustekinumab compared with placebo patients in a group of TNF-α antagonist failure patients (relative benefit [RB] = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.28-2.04) and in the following subgroups: secondary nonresponders (RB = 1.98; 95% CI: 1.49-2.63), intolerant patients (RB = 1.47; 95% CI: 1.01-2.13) and patients who failed at least two TNF-α antagonists (RB = 2.19; 95% CI: 1.53-3.14) but in case of primary nonresponders it occurred insignificant (RB = 1.22; 95% CI: 0.76-1.98). The clinical remission in TNF-α antagonist failure population was significantly higher for patients who received ustekinumab compared with placebo (RB = 1.72; 95% CI: 1.17-2.53). Pooled analysis revealed that risk of adverse events in induction phase of therapy was not significantly different (risk ratio = 0.96; 95% CI: 0.86-1.06) between ustekinumab and placebo groups.
CONCLUSION: The clinical response was significantly higher for TNF-α antagonist failure patients who received ustekinumab as well as in subgroups of secondary nonresponders or intolerant patients but not in case of primary nonresponders. Ustekinumab occurred as safe as placebo in the induction as well as in a maintenance phase of therapy.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
A Guide to the Use of Vasopressors and Inotropes for Patients in Shock.Journal of Intensive Care Medicine 2024 April 14
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app