We have located links that may give you full text access.
Predictors, Classification, and Management of Umbilical Complications in DIEP Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery 2017 July
BACKGROUND: In recent years, the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap has become the workhorse flap for autologous breast reconstruction. Despite increased reports on DIEP flaps, umbilical complications have not been previously studied. The aesthetics of the umbilicus dictates the beauty of the abdomen, and it is critical for plastic surgeons to minimize the scarring of the umbilicus. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent DIEP flaps to determine the predictors of umbilical complications, and created a classification system of these wounds.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 323 patients who underwent DIEP flap surgery from 2009 to 2016 was performed. Umbilical stalk heights, widths of fascial diastasis, and abdominal wall thicknesses were measured from computed tomographic scans. Data regarding demographic and patient characteristics were collected.
RESULTS: Of the 323 patients, there were 58 patients that had umbilical complications (18 percent). These patients had statistically higher body mass indexes, heavier flaps, and thicker abdominal walls (p < 0.05). Also, they had statistically higher umbilical stalk heights (29.3 mm versus 18.7 mm), and analysis showed that the likelihood ratio of having umbilical complications was 2.05 at 20.1 mm, 3.05 at 25.4 mm, and 6.43 at 30 mm. Logistic regression analysis revealed that umbilical stalk height, fascial diastasis, age, procedure time, and flap weight were significant predictors (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Umbilical complications in patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery for breast reconstruction have not been previously studied. Our study shows that the umbilical stalk height plays a significant role, and umbilical wounds can be classified into five types: no wound, minor wound, wound dehiscence, partial necrosis, and total necrosis.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
METHODS: Retrospective review of 323 patients who underwent DIEP flap surgery from 2009 to 2016 was performed. Umbilical stalk heights, widths of fascial diastasis, and abdominal wall thicknesses were measured from computed tomographic scans. Data regarding demographic and patient characteristics were collected.
RESULTS: Of the 323 patients, there were 58 patients that had umbilical complications (18 percent). These patients had statistically higher body mass indexes, heavier flaps, and thicker abdominal walls (p < 0.05). Also, they had statistically higher umbilical stalk heights (29.3 mm versus 18.7 mm), and analysis showed that the likelihood ratio of having umbilical complications was 2.05 at 20.1 mm, 3.05 at 25.4 mm, and 6.43 at 30 mm. Logistic regression analysis revealed that umbilical stalk height, fascial diastasis, age, procedure time, and flap weight were significant predictors (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Umbilical complications in patients undergoing DIEP flap surgery for breast reconstruction have not been previously studied. Our study shows that the umbilical stalk height plays a significant role, and umbilical wounds can be classified into five types: no wound, minor wound, wound dehiscence, partial necrosis, and total necrosis.
CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, III.
Full text links
Related Resources
Trending Papers
Challenges in Septic Shock: From New Hemodynamics to Blood Purification Therapies.Journal of Personalized Medicine 2024 Februrary 4
Molecular Targets of Novel Therapeutics for Diabetic Kidney Disease: A New Era of Nephroprotection.International Journal of Molecular Sciences 2024 April 4
Perioperative echocardiographic strain analysis: what anesthesiologists should know.Canadian Journal of Anaesthesia 2024 April 11
The 'Ten Commandments' for the 2023 European Society of Cardiology guidelines for the management of endocarditis.European Heart Journal 2024 April 18
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app