Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Progressive Brain Atrophy Despite Persistent Viral Suppression in HIV Patients Older Than 60 Years.

BACKGROUND: Current HIV treatments are successful at suppressing plasma HIV RNA to undetectable levels for most adherent patients. Yet, emerging evidence suggests that viral suppression will inadequately control inflammation and mitigate risk for progressive brain injury. We sought to quantify differences in longitudinal brain atrophy rates among older virally suppressed HIV-infected participants compared with that of healthy aging participants.

METHODS: We examined longitudinal structural brain magnetic resonance imaging atrophy rates using region of interest assessments and voxel-wise tensor-based morphometry in HIV-infected participants older than 60 years (n = 38) compared with age-matched HIV-uninfected healthy and cognitively normal controls (n = 24).

RESULTS: The mean age of participants was 63 years, the mean estimated duration of infection was 21 years, and the median duration of documented viral suppression was 3.2 years. Average proximal and nadir CD4 counts were 550 and 166, respectively; 15/38 (39%) met criteria for HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder. In models adjusting for age and sex, HIV serostatus was associated with more rapid average annualized rates of atrophy in the cerebellum (0.42% vs. 0.02%, P = 0.016), caudate (0.74% vs. 0.03%, P = 0.012), frontal lobe (0.48% vs. 0.01%, P = 0.034), total cortical gray matter (0.65% vs. 0.16%, P = 0.027), brainstem (0.31% vs. 0.01%, P = 0.026), and pallidum (0.73% vs. 0.39%, P = 0.046). Among those with HIV, atrophy rates did not differ statistically by cognitive status.

CONCLUSIONS: Despite persistent control of plasma viremia, these older HIV-infected participants demonstrate more rapid progressive brain atrophy when compared with healthy aging. Either HIV or other factors that differ between older HIV-infected participants and healthy controls could be responsible for these differences.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app