Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

[Protective effects of valproic acid on gut barrier function after major burn injury and its mechanism].

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the potential protective effects of valproic acid (VPA) on gut barrier function after major burn injury in rats and its mechanism.

METHODS: Forty male Sprague-Dawley (SD) rats were divided into sham + normal saline (NS), sham + VPA, scald + NS, and scald + VPA groups, with 10 rats in each group. Rat with 55% total body surface area (TBSA) third-degree severe-burns model was reproduced by immersing into 80 °C water, and the rats in sham groups were given sham-burns by immersing into 37 °C water. The rats after severe-burns were immediately treated with 0.25 mL of 300 mg/kg VPA or NS by subcutaneous injection. Rats were sacrificed at 2 hours and 6 hours after injury, and abdominal aortic blood and ileal tissue were harvested. The levels of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The intestinal permeability was evaluated by fluorescein isothiocyanate-dextran (FITC-dextran) determination. The histomorphological changes in gut barrier were evaluated by Chiu grading system. Levels of acetylated lysine at the ninth position of histone 3 protein (Ac-H3K9), hypoxia-inducible factor 1α (HIF-1α), zona occludens 1 (ZO-1) and myosin light chain kinase (MLCK) were determined by immunofluorescence staining and Western Blot.

RESULTS: Compared with sham + NS group, rats in scald + NS group showed intestinal mucosal damage 2 hours after burn injury, as well as increased mucosal permeability, protein expression levels of HIF-1α, VEGF, MLCK, and lowered levels of AC-H3K9 and ZO-1. These changes were much more prominent at 6 hours after injury. VPA treatment significantly attenuated the burn-induced intestinal damage. Compared with scald + NS group, the protective effects in scald + VPA group was not evident at 2 hours after injury; however, intestinal damage was much less severe at 6 hours after injury (Chiu score: 2.03±0.27 vs. 3.12±0.15), intestinal permeability was significantly decreased [FITC-dextran (μg/L): 709±76 vs. 1 138±75], histone acetylation was enhanced [Ac-H3K9 (gray value): 1.55±0.12 vs. 0.48±0.12], ZO-1 degradation was significantly inhibited (gray value: 0.69±0.12 vs. 0.43±0.16), the protein expression levels of VEGF and MLCK were significantly down-regulated [VEGF (ng/mg): 51.7±3.7 vs. 71.2±4.3, MLCK (gray value): 1.98±0.20 vs. 2.80±0.24], while the HIF-1α protein expression levels were significantly reduced at both 2 hours and 6 hours after injury (gray value: 2.50±0.39 vs. 3.88±0.42 at 2 hours, 1.83±0.42 vs. 4.42±0.41 at 6 hours, all P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: Severe burn injury can induce histone deacetylation, ZO-1 degradation and intestinal barrier dysfunction. VPA can improve the levels of histone acetylation and ZO-1, and protect intestinal epithelial barrier function. These may probably be mediated through inhibiting HIF-1α and its downstream gene VEGF and MLCK.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app