Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Emergency Department Urinary Antibiograms Differ by Specific Patient Group.

Patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) represent a heterogeneous population comprised of all ages, various backgrounds, such as from the community and skilled-nursing facilities (SNFs), and at various risks for resistant pathogens. The aim of this study was to compare patient group-specific urinary antibiograms in the ED. Adults presented to the ED with an ICD 9/10 code urinary tract infection (UTI) diagnosis during July 2015 to June 2016 were randomly selected ( n = 500) to extract relevant demographic, laboratory, and clinical data from the medical record. Urinary Escherichia coli antibiograms were compared between institutional versus ED and among ED patients (male versus female; age of 18 to 64 years versus ≥65 years; female aged 18 to 50 years versus >50 years; home versus SNF; and admitted versus discharged). E. coli grew from 56% (145/259) of the positive urine cultures. Overall ciprofloxacin (CIP), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (SXT), and cefazolin (CFZ) susceptibilities were <71%. Differences in antibiograms were the following: lower CFZ and SXT susceptibilities in ED versus institutional (CFZ, 67% versus 86% [ P = 0.001]; SXT, 66% versus 74% [ P = 0.02]), lower ampicillin and gentamicin susceptibilities in females aged 18 to 50 years versus >50 years (32% versus 52% [ P = 0.04]; 78% versus 93% [ P = 0.02]), lower CIP susceptibilities in the elderly (64% versus 81%; P = 0.03), SNF versus home (35% versus 77%; P < 0.001), admitted versus discharged (63% versus 78%; P = 0.04), and lower SXT susceptibilities in patients aged <65 years versus the elderly (58% versus 71%; P = 0.01). Nitrofurantoin showed >80% susceptibility in all groups. Patient group-specific urinary antibiograms revealed distinct differences in E. coli susceptibility and should be developed to better inform empirical UTI therapy selection in the ED.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app