Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Tachypnea and Other Danger Signs vs Pulse Oximetry for Prediction of Hypoxia in Severe Pneumonia/Very Severe Disease.

Indian Pediatrics 2017 September 16
OBJECTIVE: To compare the performance of respiratory rate and other clinical signs against pulse oximetry for predicting hypoxia in children with Severe pneumonia/Very severe disease as per Integrated Management of Neonatal and Childhood Illness (IMNCI) classification.

DESIGN: Cross-sectional study.

SETTING: Pediatric emergency department of a tertiary-care hospital in Delhi, India.

SUBJECTS: 112 hospitalized children (2 mo - 5 y) with Severe pneumonia/Very severe disease as per IMNCI classification.

METHODS: Respiratory rate was recorded at enrolment, along with other clinical signs and symptoms. Oxygen saturation (SpO2) was measured by a pulse oximeter. Clinical predictors of hypoxia (SpO2 <90%) and their combinations (index test) were evaluated for their sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value for diagnosis of hypoxia, against pulse oximetry (reference test).

RESULTS: Hypoxia was present in 57 (50.9%) children. Presence of tachypnea, head nodding, irritability, inability to drink/breastfeed, vomiting, and altered sensorium was significantly associated with hypoxia (P<0.05). Multiple logistic regression revealed that age-specific tachypnea (RR≥70/min for 2-12 mo, and RR ≥60/min for ≥12 mo), head nodding, and inability to drink/breastfeed were independent predictors for hypoxia with sensitivity of 70.2%, 50.9% and 75.4%, respectively; and specificity of 88.9%, 96.4%, and 90.9%, respectively. When all three predictors were used in conjunction, the sensitivity increased to 91.2% and specificity was 81.8%.

CONCLUSION: No single clinical sign can perform as well as pulse oximetry for predicting hypoxia in children with severe pneumonia. In settings where pulse oximetry is not available, combination of signs, age-specific tachypnea, head nodding, and inability to drink/breastfeeding has acceptable sensitivity and specificity.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app