In vitro digital subtraction angiographic evaluation of flow diverters in a patient-specific aneurysm.

Background The importance of both porosity and pore density of a flow diverter is well recognized in treatment of intracranial aneurysms; however, understanding of the effect of individual wire (wire number and size) is critical in improving device design and use. Methods A total of 10 multi-layered flow diverters with different wire numbers (32, 48, 56, and 72) and sizes (30, 35, and 40 µm) were implanted into identical patient-specific middle cerebral artery aneurysm models. Digital subtraction angiography was acquired at 30 f/s and X-ray signals at three selected regions of interest were compared to determine the amount of intra-aneurysmal flow. Results Flow reduction ranged from 19% for a high porosity (82%) and low pore density (5 pores/mm2 ) to nearly 80% for a low porosity (49%) and high pore density (36 pores/mm2 ). An increase in the wire number from 32 to 72 lowers intra-aneurysmal flow and redirects the flow jet; however, the effect of wire size is not observed. Conclusions In our in vitro angiographic study, flow jet is influenced by the wire number in a device qualitatively; quantitatively, intra-aneurysmal flow is affected by both the porosity and pore density. A 2.5 mm device performs better in flow diversion of a middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysm than a 3 mm device with the same wire size and wire number, but thicker wires do not lead to better flow diversion.