COMPARATIVE STUDY
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography at 70 kVp with 30mL contrast agent: An intraindividual comparison with sequential scanning at 120 kVp with 60mL contrast agent.

PURPOSE: To investigate image quality, radiation dose, and diagnostic efficiency of prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch coronary CT angiography (CCTA) at 70 kVp with 30mL contrast agent intra-individually compared with routine CCTA protocol.

MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred and thirty eight patients with suspected coronary artery disease, body mass index (BMI)≤25kg/m2 and heart rate (HR)≤70 beats per minute (bpm) underwent prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70 kVp and 30mL contrast agent (protocol A) and prospectively ECG-triggered sequential scanning at 120 kVp and 60mL contrast medium (protocol B). Objective and subjective image quality, radiation doses, and diagnostic accuracy were evaluated and compared between the two protocols.

RESULTS: Higher CT attenuation, higher noise, lower signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) and lower contrast-to-noise ratios (CNRs) were found in protocol A than in protocol B (P<0.001). However, image quality of protocol A were diagnostic. In patients with BMI<23kg/m2 or HR<60bpm, subjective image quality scores of some coronary arteries in protocol A were not significantly different from protocol B (P>0.05). Effective dose in protocol A has reduced by 96.7% compared with protocol B (P<0.001). No significant differences were found for diagnostic accuracy between the two protocols on a per-segment (P=0.513), per-vessel (P=0.317) and per-patient (P=0.125) basis.

CONCLUSIONS: Prospectively ECG-triggered high-pitch CCTA at 70kVp with 30mL contrast agent can reduce radiation dose but maintain image quality and high diagnostic accuracy in a selected, non-obese population.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app