Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Differences in Sociocognitive Beliefs between Involved and Noninvolved Employees during the Implementation of an Electronic Health Record System.

BACKGROUND: Electronic health records (EHRs) can improve quality and efficiency in patient care. However, the intention to work with such a new system is often relatively low among employees because the work processes of the healthcare organization may change. Involving employees in an EHR implementation may increase their beliefs and perceived capabilities concerning the new system. The current study aimed to assess the role of involvement and its effects on sociocognitive beliefs regarding the implementation of a new EHR system.

METHODS: The study was performed in June 2015 among all eligible employees of a hospital in the Netherlands. Both involved and noninvolved employees were invited to complete a paper-based questionnaire concerning their sociocognitive beliefs (i.e., attitude, social influence, self-efficacy, and intention) related to the EHR implementation. Independent sample t-tests were used to assess potential differences in sociocognitive beliefs between employees who were involved in the implementation process and those who were not. Effect sizes (Cohen's d ) were calculated to indicate the standardized difference between the means.

RESULTS: A total of 359 participants completed the paper-based questionnaire and were included in the analyses. Involved employees ( n = 94) reported significantly higher levels of attitude ( p < .001, d = .62), perceived self-efficacy ( p = .01, d = .31), social support ( p < .001, d = .68), and a higher intention to work with the new EHR system ( p < .001, d = .60), compared with the group of employees who were not involved in the implementation process ( n = 265).

CONCLUSION: Involving employees during an EHR implementation appears to enhance employees' sociocognitive beliefs and increases their intention to work with the new system.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app