Comparative Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Rectus femoris muscle atrophy and recovery caused by preoperative pretibial traction in femoral shaft fractures-comparison between traction period.

BACKGROUND: Skeletal traction is performed to temporarily stabilize fracture sites before surgery in patients with femoral fracture. To date, however, there is no study evaluating the difference in the degree of the recovery, of the muscle strength, as well as muscle atrophy following skeletal traction. The purpose of this study was to compare the degree of recovery of rectus femoris muscle strength after surgery in association with muscle atrophy by analyzing the duration of preoperative tibial traction, age and sex in patients with femoral fracture.

HYPOTHESIS: Rectus femoris muscle atrophy will progress depending on the duration of preoperative tibial traction, age and sex in patients with femoral fracture.

PATIENTS AND METHOD: Thirty-one patients who underwent preoperative pretibial skeletal traction and intramedullary nailing were divided into two groups according to the traction period: group A (n=12) with a duration of traction of <7 days (mean: 4.08±1.78 days) and group B (n=19) ≥7 days (mean: 13.63±7.17 days). The degree of muscle atrophy and recovery were compared between the two groups, according to age and gender. The degree of muscle atrophy was measured by the difference in thickness of the rectus femoris between pre- and post-traction using ultrasound. The degree of muscle recovery was evaluated by the Q-setting and heel off time. Clinical outcome was evaluated by the non-union rate and Lysholm score.

RESULTS: The degree of muscle atrophy was 0.99±0.14mm in group A and 2.22±0.11mm in group B (P<0.001). The Q-setting time was 4.83±0.94 days in group A and 6.56±1.38 days in group B (P=0.001). Heel off time was also shorter in group A at 2.58±0.90 days, taking 3.72±1.27 days in group B (P=0.012). The recovery rate in the rectus femoris was significantly higher in group A than in group B (P<0.001). There was no significant difference in non-union rate between group A and B (P=0.672) but the mean Lysholm score at the last follow-up was significantly higher in group A than in group B (P=0.006). However, no significant differences were detected in the mean thickness of the rectus femoris, Q-setting, and heel off time between the different age and gender groups (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS: The prolonged duration of preoperative skeletal traction indicates not only that the resulting disuse atrophy would progress further but also that the muscle atrophy would be accelerated more rapidly for shorter periods of time, based on a cut-off value of 7 days. In addition, the rate of rectus femoris muscle recovery and clinical outcomes were lower in patients undergoing traction for longer periods of time. This indicates that it would be effective for increasing the rate of the recovery and minimizing the occurrence of post surgical complications if surgeons could perform surgery at the earliest possible opportunity following traction, within seven days after the onset of trauma.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective cohort study.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app