[COMPARISON OF QUALITY OF COLONOSCOPY IN AN ACADEMIC HOSPITAL VS. A COMMUNITY HOSPITAL OUTPATIENT SERVICE].

BACKGROUND: Extensive use of colonoscopy in hospitals and community clinics has highlighted the need to assess the quality of the procedures in order to reduce costs and increase their efficiency.

OBJECTIVES: This institutional review board (IRB)-approved study aimed to compare the quality of colonoscopies performed in a teaching hospital to those performed at a community health service.

METHODS: Demographic information, time of procedure, indications, quality of bowel preparation, premedication, depth of examination, polyp detection, biopsies and followup recommendations were retrospectively obtained from 700 colonoscopy reports from the Rambam Healthcare Campus and 824 colonoscopy reports from Elisha. This data was compared to relevant literature benchmarks.

RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the hospital vs. community endoscopy services in the patients' demographics, depth of examination (92.4% vs. 94.1% complete), polyp detection rate (29.1% vs. 26.8%) and biopsies in patients with diarrhea (75% vs. 67%). Indications for colonoscopy differed: gastrointestinal bleeding was more common at the hospital, while screening was more common in the community. Premedication varied: more fentanyl and dormicum and less propofol were used in the community. Good bowel preparation was more frequent in the community (68.8% vs. 47.2% in hospital, p<0.0001). Follow-up recommendations were documented more often in the community (74% vs. 53% in hospital, p<0.0001). The range for many quality indicators (QIs) varied greatly amongst physicians.

CONCLUSIONS: Remediation of weaker areas seems feasible through upgrading electronic medical records and increasing awareness of quality indicators (Qis). Colonoscopies performed in both hospital and community services were of good quality compared to the relevant literature, with significant variations in some QIs.