REFERRAL OF OLDER THYROID CANCER PATIENTS TO A HIGH-VOLUME SURGEON: RESULTS OF A MULTIDISCIPLINARY PHYSICIAN SURVEY.

OBJECTIVE: Surgical outcomes of thyroid cancer patients are improved with high-volume surgeons. However, age disparities in referral to specialist surgical centers still exist. The factors that influence decision making regarding referral of older thyroid cancer patients to high-volume surgeons remain unknown.

METHODS: We surveyed members of the Endocrine Society, American College of Physicians, and American Academy of Family Practice.

RESULTS: Overall, 270 physicians completed the survey. Patient preference (69%), transportation barriers (62%), and confidence in local surgeon (54%) were the most cited factors decreasing likelihood of referral to a high-volume surgeon. In clinical scenarios, referral rates to a high-volume surgeon were similar for patients aged 40 and 65 years with a 1-cm thyroid nodule diagnostic of thyroid cancer (n = 137 [54%]; n = 132 [52%], respectively) as for an 85-year-old with a 4-cm nodule (n = 148 [59%]). When comorbidities were introduced, more physicians (n = 186 [74%]) would refer a 65-year-old with a 4-cm thyroid nodule and comorbidities, compared to an 85-year-old with the same nodule size without comorbidi-ties. In multivariable analysis, treating >10 thyroid cancer patients/year (P<.001; P<.005) and endocrinology specialty (P = .003; P = .003) were associated with referral to a high-volume surgeon for a 65-year-old with comorbidities and an 85-year-old without comorbidities, respectively.

CONCLUSION: Understanding surgical referral patterns of older thyroid cancer patients is vital in identifying obstacles in the referral process. We found that patient factors including comorbidities and physician factors including specialty and patient volume influence these patterns. This is the first step towards developing targeted interventions for these patients.