Add like
Add dislike
Add to saved papers

Clinical outcomes of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery versus conventional phacoemulsification surgery for hard nuclear cataracts.

PURPOSE: To compare the outcomes between femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (femtosecond group) and conventional phacoemulsification cataract surgery (conventional group) in patients with hard nuclear cataract.

SETTING: Eye Center, Second Affiliated Hospital of School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.

DESIGN: Prospective consecutive nonrandomized comparative cohort study.

METHODS: According to the Emery-Little classification, cataract patients with a grade 4 or 5 hard nuclei were assigned to 1 of the 2 groups. The endothelial cell density (ECD), central corneal thickness (CCT), and uncorrected and corrected (CDVA) distance visual acuities were evaluated preoperatively and 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months postoperatively.

RESULTS: The study comprised 95 eyes (47 in the femtosecond group; 48 in the conventional group). The effective phacoemulsification time, absolute phaco time, and mean ultrasound power were lower in the femtosecond group (P < .001, P = .001, and P < .001, respectively). The ECD in the conventional group was lower and the changes in endothelial cell loss was different between the 2 groups throughout the follow-up (both P < .001). The CCT increased after surgery, and the thickness was greater in the conventional group at 1 day postoperatively (P < .05); it then returned to preoperative levels 1 month postoperatively in the femtosecond group and at 3 months in the conventional group. The CDVA was stable by 1 month postoperatively in the femtosecond group and by 3 months in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION: Compared with conventional phacoemulsification, femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery for hard nuclear cataracts conserved phacoemulsification power, provided a significant reduction in corneal endothelial damage, and led to faster visual rehabilitation.

Full text links

We have located links that may give you full text access.
Can't access the paper?
Try logging in through your university/institutional subscription. For a smoother one-click institutional access experience, please use our mobile app.

Related Resources

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

Mobile app image

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app

All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.

By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.

Your Privacy Choices Toggle icon

You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now

Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university

For the best experience, use the Read mobile app