We have located links that may give you full text access.
Intereye comparison of femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery capsulotomy and manual capsulorhexis edge strength.
Journal of Cataract and Refractive Surgery 2017 April
PURPOSE: To compare the breaking force required to tear the explanted capsule after femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery in the worse eye and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye.
SETTING: Personaleyes, Sydney, Australia.
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized case study.
METHOD: Patients with bilateral cataract had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the Lensx laser in the eye with worse vision and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye. Each explanted capsule was stretched mechanically, and the breaking force and strain in grams (g) were compared. When a large contralateral difference in capsule strength was found, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was applied to determine whether morphologic imperfections were present in a case with a weak capsule.
RESULTS: Paired samples of 78 eyes of 39 patients were tested. The mean breaking force was not significantly different between manual capsulorhexes (2.3 g ± 2.0 [SD]) and femtosecond laser capsulotomies (2.0 ± 2.2 g, P = .52). The breaking strain for the manual samples (33.8% ± 18.3%) and for the femtosecond laser samples (34.6% ± 18.6%) were also not significantly different (P = .81). In 5 patients, in the femtosecond group, the capsules required considerably less force to break than the capsules in the manual group. However, the SEM images of these samples did not show specific laser imperfections.
CONCLUSION: In paired human eyes, the capsulotomies created by a femtosecond laser with a contact lens interface were as strong as manual capsulorhexes.
SETTING: Personaleyes, Sydney, Australia.
DESIGN: Prospective nonrandomized case study.
METHOD: Patients with bilateral cataract had femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery with the Lensx laser in the eye with worse vision and manual cataract surgery in the contralateral eye. Each explanted capsule was stretched mechanically, and the breaking force and strain in grams (g) were compared. When a large contralateral difference in capsule strength was found, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was applied to determine whether morphologic imperfections were present in a case with a weak capsule.
RESULTS: Paired samples of 78 eyes of 39 patients were tested. The mean breaking force was not significantly different between manual capsulorhexes (2.3 g ± 2.0 [SD]) and femtosecond laser capsulotomies (2.0 ± 2.2 g, P = .52). The breaking strain for the manual samples (33.8% ± 18.3%) and for the femtosecond laser samples (34.6% ± 18.6%) were also not significantly different (P = .81). In 5 patients, in the femtosecond group, the capsules required considerably less force to break than the capsules in the manual group. However, the SEM images of these samples did not show specific laser imperfections.
CONCLUSION: In paired human eyes, the capsulotomies created by a femtosecond laser with a contact lens interface were as strong as manual capsulorhexes.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app