We have located links that may give you full text access.
Changes in deviation of absorbed dose to water among users by chamber calibration shift.
Japanese Journal of Radiology 2017 July
PURPOSE: The JSMP01 dosimetry protocol had adopted the provisional60 Co calibration coefficient [Formula: see text], namely, the product of exposure calibration coefficient NC and conversion coefficient kD,X . After that, the absorbed dose to water Dw standard was established, and the JSMP12 protocol adopted the [Formula: see text] calibration. In this study, the influence of the calibration shift on the measurement of Dw among users was analyzed.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intercomparison of the Dw using an ionization chamber was annually performed by visiting related hospitals. Intercomparison results before and after the calibration shift were analyzed, the deviation of Dw among users was re-evaluated, and the cause of deviation was estimated.
RESULTS: As a result, the stability of LINAC, calibration of the thermometer and barometer, and collection method of ion recombination were confirmed. The statistical significance of standard deviation of Dw was not observed, but that of difference of Dw among users was observed between NC and [Formula: see text] calibration.
CONCLUSION: Uncertainty due to chamber-to-chamber variation was reduced by the calibration shift, consequently reducing the uncertainty among users regarding Dw . The result also pointed out uncertainty might be reduced by accurate and detailed instructions on the setup of an ionization chamber.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The intercomparison of the Dw using an ionization chamber was annually performed by visiting related hospitals. Intercomparison results before and after the calibration shift were analyzed, the deviation of Dw among users was re-evaluated, and the cause of deviation was estimated.
RESULTS: As a result, the stability of LINAC, calibration of the thermometer and barometer, and collection method of ion recombination were confirmed. The statistical significance of standard deviation of Dw was not observed, but that of difference of Dw among users was observed between NC and [Formula: see text] calibration.
CONCLUSION: Uncertainty due to chamber-to-chamber variation was reduced by the calibration shift, consequently reducing the uncertainty among users regarding Dw . The result also pointed out uncertainty might be reduced by accurate and detailed instructions on the setup of an ionization chamber.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app