Quantitative Comparison of the Intraoperative Utility of Indocyanine Green and Fluorescein Videoangiographies in Cerebrovascular Surgery.

BACKGROUND: A quantitative analysis comparing indocyanine green videoangiography (ICG-VAG) and fluorescein videoangiography (FL-VAG) in cerebrovascular surgery has not been reported so far.

OBJECTIVE: To clear the differences of characteristics of ICG-VAG and FL-VAG by quantitative assessment.

METHODS: We prospectively analyzed results from 23 patients (3 males; mean age at surgery: 60.9 years, range: 14-75 years) at our hospital from August 2014 to July 2015. Eighteen patients had cerebral aneurysms for clipping, and 5 had intracranial arterial stenosis for superficial temporal artery (STA)-middle cerebral artery bypass. We imported data from the operative image data, converted by Audio Video Interleave to Aquacosmos as picture fluorescence intensity-analyzing software. Regions of interest were set at the parent artery, dome of aneurysms, and perforating artery in cases of clipping of aneurysms, and setting at 3 points in STA, in case of bypass. The transition of fluorescence intensity at each region of interest was calculated and plotted using Aquacosmos.

RESULTS: Thick-walled artery, such as parent artery ( P = .0017) and STA ( P = .0182), was more significantly visualized by ICG-VAG than FL-VAG, whereas the perforating artery, especially in deep surgical fields, such as anterior communicating artery, internal carotid artery, and basilar artery, was better visualized by FL-VAG than ICG-VAG ( P < .0001).

CONCLUSION: In this quantitative analysis of fluorescence study, ICG-VAG showed greater efficacy than FL-VAG in visualizing relatively thick arteries, such as parent artery and STA. However, FL-VAG has greater efficacy than ICG-VAG in visualizing perforating artery, especially in deep surgical fields with characteristic vessel walls.