We have located links that may give you full text access.
Is segmental epidural anaesthesia an optimal technique for patients undergoing percutaneous nephrolithotomy?
Indian Journal of Anaesthesia 2017 April
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Neuraxial anaesthesia has recently become popular for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). We conducted a study comparing general anaesthesia (GA) with segmental (T6 -T12 ) epidural anaesthesia (SEA) for PCNL with respect to anaesthesia and surgical characteristics.
METHODS: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status-I and II patients undergoing PCNL randomly received either GA or SEA. Overall patient satisfaction was the primary end point. Intraoperative haemodynamics, epidural block characteristics, post-operative pain, time to rescue analgesic, total analgesic consumption, discharge times from post-anaesthesia care unit, surgeon satisfaction scores and stone clearance were secondary end points. Parametric data were analysed by Student's t -test while non-parametric data were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test.
RESULTS: Group SEA reported better patient satisfaction ( P = 0.005). Patients in group GA had significantly higher heart rates ( P = 0.0001) and comparable mean arterial pressures ( P = 0.24). Postoperatively, time to first rescue analgesic and total tramadol consumption was higher in Group GA ( P = 0.001). Group SEA had lower pain scores ( P = 0.001). Time to reach Aldrete's score of 9 was shorter in group SEA ( P = 0.0001). The incidence of nausea was higher in group GA ( P = 0.001); vomiting rates were comparable ( P = 0.15). One patient in group SEA developed bradycardia which was successfully treated. Eight patients (18%) had hypertensive episodes in group GA versus none in group SEA ( P = 0.0001). One patient in GA group had pleural injury and was managed with intercostal drain. Stone clearance and post-operative haemoglobin levels were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: PCNL under SEA has a role in selected patients, for short duration surgery and in expert hands.
METHODS: Ninety American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status-I and II patients undergoing PCNL randomly received either GA or SEA. Overall patient satisfaction was the primary end point. Intraoperative haemodynamics, epidural block characteristics, post-operative pain, time to rescue analgesic, total analgesic consumption, discharge times from post-anaesthesia care unit, surgeon satisfaction scores and stone clearance were secondary end points. Parametric data were analysed by Student's t -test while non-parametric data were compared with Mann-Whitney U-test.
RESULTS: Group SEA reported better patient satisfaction ( P = 0.005). Patients in group GA had significantly higher heart rates ( P = 0.0001) and comparable mean arterial pressures ( P = 0.24). Postoperatively, time to first rescue analgesic and total tramadol consumption was higher in Group GA ( P = 0.001). Group SEA had lower pain scores ( P = 0.001). Time to reach Aldrete's score of 9 was shorter in group SEA ( P = 0.0001). The incidence of nausea was higher in group GA ( P = 0.001); vomiting rates were comparable ( P = 0.15). One patient in group SEA developed bradycardia which was successfully treated. Eight patients (18%) had hypertensive episodes in group GA versus none in group SEA ( P = 0.0001). One patient in GA group had pleural injury and was managed with intercostal drain. Stone clearance and post-operative haemoglobin levels were comparable in both groups.
CONCLUSION: PCNL under SEA has a role in selected patients, for short duration surgery and in expert hands.
Full text links
Related Resources
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app