We have located links that may give you full text access.
JOURNAL ARTICLE
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
The influence of the crutch setup on stability and weight-bearing parameters in post total hip replacement surgery patients during quiet standing.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of the crutch setup on standing, in post total hip replacement (THR) surgery patients.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients after THR were randomly assigned to walking with the elbow flexed (EF) or elbow straight (ES) crutch setup. Subjects were asked to stand on a force platform in a comfortable position with the crutch positioned on the unaffected side, facing forward for 10 seconds. Centre of pressure total path and maximal excursion were evaluated in both medio-lateral and anterior-posterior planes. Difference in the asymmetry of left/right acromial height, measured with and without the crutch, was calculated (ACdiff). Percentage of body weight borne by the crutch (Fcr), symmetry (SIload) between operated and healthy limbs loading during the trial, together with shoulder forces and moments were measured.
RESULTS: No significant differences between the two groups (p > .05) were found for stability parameters. ACdiff, Fcr and shoulder load increased significantly (p < .05) in EF group compared to ES group. In addition leg loading symmetry was significantly reduced in the EF group.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the ES setup reduced the force borne by the crutch, the load on the shoulder joint and it minimized postural and loading asymmetries when compared to EF setup. Conversely, postural stability was not influenced by the crutch setup. Implications for Rehabilitation Static posture and weight-bearing parameters are influenced by crutch setup during quiet standing. Crutch setup does not influence postural stability. Adjusting the crutch according to the elbow straight setup reduces the force borne by the crutch and the asymmetry in lower limbs loading. Forces and moments at the shoulder joint were reduced for the elbow straight setup group.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty patients after THR were randomly assigned to walking with the elbow flexed (EF) or elbow straight (ES) crutch setup. Subjects were asked to stand on a force platform in a comfortable position with the crutch positioned on the unaffected side, facing forward for 10 seconds. Centre of pressure total path and maximal excursion were evaluated in both medio-lateral and anterior-posterior planes. Difference in the asymmetry of left/right acromial height, measured with and without the crutch, was calculated (ACdiff). Percentage of body weight borne by the crutch (Fcr), symmetry (SIload) between operated and healthy limbs loading during the trial, together with shoulder forces and moments were measured.
RESULTS: No significant differences between the two groups (p > .05) were found for stability parameters. ACdiff, Fcr and shoulder load increased significantly (p < .05) in EF group compared to ES group. In addition leg loading symmetry was significantly reduced in the EF group.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study showed that the ES setup reduced the force borne by the crutch, the load on the shoulder joint and it minimized postural and loading asymmetries when compared to EF setup. Conversely, postural stability was not influenced by the crutch setup. Implications for Rehabilitation Static posture and weight-bearing parameters are influenced by crutch setup during quiet standing. Crutch setup does not influence postural stability. Adjusting the crutch according to the elbow straight setup reduces the force borne by the crutch and the asymmetry in lower limbs loading. Forces and moments at the shoulder joint were reduced for the elbow straight setup group.
Full text links
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app
All material on this website is protected by copyright, Copyright © 1994-2024 by WebMD LLC.
This website also contains material copyrighted by 3rd parties.
By using this service, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy.
Your Privacy Choices
You can now claim free CME credits for this literature searchClaim now
Get seemless 1-tap access through your institution/university
For the best experience, use the Read mobile app